researched paper
You wrote a very expansive and researched paper on morality and self-interests. From your standpoint that acting morally is not always at odds with self-interest. I agree that acting morally depends on various factors and situation. In particular, it relates to following policies but ethical egoism is not a divine command. Invoking moral considerations it sometimes plays a role in constraining or limiting the pursuit of individual preferences and goals for the sake of others.
There are two forms of egoism- they include normative and physiological egoism. Moral philosophy explains deontology ethics as the duty or obligation as the normative ethical theory. Therefore, under a series of rules, molarity theory of actions should be judged as right or wrong rather than the actual consequences of the actions. At times, moral philosophy is the rule, obligation or duty based on ethics. It equates to consequentialism, pragmatic, virtue ethics. Subsequently, the actions are essential compared to the results.
A popular descriptive position, psychological egoism claims that individuals have aims that ultimately focus on their own welfare. The desire and preferences accounts pinpoint self-interests with personal desire’s satisfaction. Often, such desires can possibly be restricted to self-regarding interests. Normative egoism indicates that the actions of what one should be doing rather than describing one does. Therefore ethical egoism dictates that one ought to perform their activities if and only if or because the action performed serves self-interests. However, it is not right to cause environmental problems just because of profit maximization and interests of the shareholders. People should act the way they behave. According to Varis and Jolkkonen (2019) requires emotional intelligence to react constructively thus give quality feedback, decisions and directions without necessarily losing objective disposition.