Cybersecurity – Discussion
The first path necessary for the discovery of specified solutions in the context of the problem. It is the responsibility of any company to determine various issues whether economical or technical and their impact firm’s security. The scope is the approach taken to determine given functions as well as features that need to be protected. They aspect as well outlines the reporting processes and specific individuals charged with roles of certain security functions in the entire plan. Feasibility aims at determining economic benefits accrued to the plan by ensuring whether the requirements meet certain laid security standards. Feasibility as well as checks if there is probable technical issue derailing the plan. An example is a firm upgrading or developing a system. The procedural activities involved display technical, specifications, and economic factors influencing the entire plan.
In the design process, scope outlines functions as well as necessary parameters of the organization’s security solutions. Further, scope sets policies as well as standards governing the company in specific. It, therefore, dictates the role of each one in the facilitation of the plan. I, therefore, believe that scope is the fundamental aspect of the design process.
A Chief Information Officer (CIO) reports directly to the CEO of an organization (Arnitz, Hütter & Riedl, 2017). They define the roles of the IT department and their specific functions within an organization. Additionally, the CIO develops the plan and how to implement it. Training of IT staff is a critical function that a CIO must ensure is comprehensive and up-to-date with current technologies. Furthermore, the CIO needs to safeguard that the organization, managers, IT staff, and users are knowledgeable and in compliance with Federal regulations. I believe the most vital function of the CIO is in the development of organizational policies. Failure to have sound policies in place can lead to major business problems for a company. This could be a loss of revenue or customer dissatisfaction. The development of thorough policies will help ensure organizational personnel maintains compliance with regulations, while still allowing for success for the organization.
The evaluation of internal controls is a way a security compliance officer (SCO) supports a CIO (Arnitz, Hütter & Riedl, 2017). This ensures that the controls are effective and if there are areas of concern the SCO can recommend processes to improve controls. The assurance that organizational policies comply with all Federal laws and regulations is an essential function of the SCO. If the security policies are not properly implemented and enforced, the organization will be held liable. This could be financial or even criminal depending on the regulation that was not correctly followed. The third most important way the SCO supports the role of the CIO is the evaluation of procurement for compliance. The SCO ensures that purchases by the organization are under laws, regulations, and contract requirements.
Reference
Arnitz, T., Hütter, A., & Riedl, R. (2017). Mutual Trust between the Chief Information Officer
and Chief Executive Officer: Insights from an Exploratory Interview Study. J. Inf. Technol. Theory Appl., 18(3), 4.
