GENDER DIVERSITY
Introduction
People are consistently not the same as one another based on various characteristics and aptitudes. Dealing with people is additionally craftsmanship. Decent variety is a growing thought. Decent variety is that individuals are distinctive because of race, sex, physical and mental aptitudes, religion, work and family guidelines, appearances, sources, sexual direction, and social direction. Each individual is made exceptionally and he/she is perceived by various properties. Overseeing assorted variety is a major test for associations, particularly overseeing sexual orientation decent variety in the top supervisory crew of association.
Heterogeneous gatherings give a decent variety of favorable circumstances, for example, advancement and planning new thoughts. It is seen that because of sexual orientation assorted variety at working environment associations has expanded its profitability and yield (Campbell & Mangoes-Vera, 2008). Ladies who are working at numerous jobs, for the most part, feel better than the ladies who connect with themselves in just family units or some different positions. Besides, females face separation concerning their activity pay. In Britain, a female working all day acquires only 82% of her male associate’s compensation, a charge that for low maintenance female specialist sinks to 60%.
The compensation hole costs a lady with normal capabilities about $250,000, during her lifetime.” The linking amid sexy alignment decent variation then firm accomplishment has been the subject of examination request for more than three decades now. Be that as it may, if organizations somehow managed to go to this collection of writing for experiences to drive their employing rehearses, they would be unable to discover reliable evidence1 on what to do. While a few examinations state that cultivating sex assorted variety improves firm results, others guarantee the inverse is valid. One more arrangement of studies finds that there is no critical connection between sexual orientation assorted variety and authoritative execution (Colgan & Ledwith, 2003). Thus, with regards to cultivating sexual alignment decent variation as a feature of their working environment methodology, private division firms are frequently left to depend on past encounters.
Thesis Statement: The fundamental focal point of this examination is to investigate the job of sexual orientation assorted variety in expertise besides viability of association besides to understand the matters in its propositions viewed by the association in overseeing sex decent variety. The primary target of this investigation is to investigate the connection between sex assorted variety and authoritative viability and what are the suggestions in overseeing sexual orientation decent variety. The vast majority of the associations guarantee that they are equivalent open door bosses then why females are recruited at lower-level assignments and what are the predispositions and generalizations which stop association to be reasonable with the two sexual orientations at work.
Literature review
As Moore, (1999) referred to in Kreitz (2007), assorted variety is centered around both explicitly, singular representative and upon entire association and its setting as it is clarified by cultural ideas. Numerous analysts have characterized this term of assorted variety as a significant contrast which makes differentiation among the staff individuals. Explicit qualities whereupon individual contrast from one another (Moore, 1999). A few people are white and some are dark. Some vary from one another upon the premise of religion. Some have a place with explicit inceptions.
Deaux & Farris (1977) recognized that the achievement of gents’ is credited to their psychological capability even simultaneously ladies’ victories were ascribed towards difficult toil, the substance of chance, or a simple assignment (Deaux & Farris, 1977). If any ladies bomb it was credited to her absence of aptitudes and capacity, however on the off chance that any man was neglected to make the progress, at that point it was ascribed that they had troublesome undertaking, or their misfortune and less exertion.
In the Spanish setting, the connection amid the lady’s executives then the commercial notoriety was inspected by Lilibeth et al, (2013). Throughout estimating the business notoriety by MERCO file they institute that within the sight of ladies on the sustenance there is an expansion in the notoriety of the organization (Lilibeth et al, 2013).
In his examination Troiano, (2013) the discoveries declare that an expansion in ladies’ investment in the work power has had numerous ramifications for associations; the exploration underpins numerous advantages to sexual orientation decent variety in positions of authority (Troiano, 2013). This infers the organizations that have a larger number of ladies than men in authority have the best budgetary execution when contrasted with different associations with fewer ladies.
David & Amalia (2011) intended to investigate exactly how feminine portrayal of commercial sheets influences the sexual orientation synthesis of the organizations ‘top administration (David & Amalia, 2011). In the American setting, they realized an affirmative relationship amongst the feminine portion of the top managerial staff in the earlier time besides the woman offer mid contemporary top officials then they likewise establish that organizations with extra ladies on the sustenance will, in general, have increasingly feminine top administrators.
The investigation by Chrobot-Mason & Aramovich, (2013) affirms that if an association neglects to make a comprehensive work in which different representatives feel welcome, the nearness of decent variety can hinder execution. Ineffectively coordinated workforce decent variety may bring about an expansion in provocation and separation, intergroup strife, and turnover (Chrobot-Mason & Aramovich, 2013). Subsequently, assorted variety and incorporation are generally matched together as hierarchical needs.
As indicated by Dhir (2018), sexual orientation decent variety in sheets rises to the assorted variety of contemplations: ladies convey alternative facts of assessment besides tactic matters in an unpredicted technique, provoking improved dynamic procedures (Dhir, 2018). Organizations with ladies on their administration positions cultivate innovativeness and advancement which present new ideas and practices, build up hierarchical structures that encourage advancement, embrace dynamic administration rehearses, give preparing and improvement to workers, and put resources into innovative work.
Şener & Karaye, (2014). inspected the distinction in sex decent variety between the two creating nations for example Turkey and Nigeria (Şener & Karaye, 2014). They found that there is no measurably huge distinction between the two nations as far as board sexual orientation decent variety and underrepresentation of female chiefs.
Bernardi & Threadgill, (2011).inspected to determine whether organizations with a sophisticated extent of ladies on their sheets of chiefs are all the further informally dependable also establish a steady proof for their contention that assorted variety of individuals (Bernardi, & Threadgill, 2011).produces a various arrangement of conclusions that effects besides mends the dynamic procedure and diminishes the deceptive choices in this way increment in socially capable conduct.
The Australian Context Jeremy (2011) analyzes whether there is whichever connection amid ladies’ chiefs also company supportability? They establish that there is an affirmative connection amid ladies’ chiefs as well as financial development, however, originate that there is no critical connection amongst lady executive and ecological eminence.
Alternately study Chrobot-Mason & Aramovich, (2013) affirms that if an association neglects to make a comprehensive work in which various representatives feel welcome, the nearness of assorted variety can restrain execution (Chrobot-Mason & Aramovich, 2013). Inadequately incorporated workforce assorted variety may bring about an expansion in badgering and separation, intergroup strife, and turnover.
The discoveries by Troiano, (2013) uncover that associations with different workforces will, in general, have more clients, expanded deals income, more prominent relative benefits, and more piece of the overall industry, higher worker work fulfillment and commitment, and lower turnover rates than associations with a homogenous workforce (Troiano, 2013).
The exploration by Doyle, (2015) investigates the various purposes behind the expansion in ladies’ cooperation in the work power (Doyle, 2015). A few factors that add to ladies’ changing job in the workforce incorporate enemy of separation laws, expanded worldwide spotlight on ladies’ privileges, more noteworthy openness to instruction and business openings, a breakdown of customary sexual orientation jobs, diminished financial reliance on men, and moderate wellbeing and youngster care.
Further, the examination by Weaver et al, (2014) uncovers that in a workforce comprising of differing representative points of view and encounters improves innovativeness while producing business arrangements because of the blend of “novel data and viewpoints, prompting better dynamic and critical thinking (Weaver et al, 2014).
The investigation by Troiano, (2014) assesses the exhibition of the two people. The discoveries from the examination further state that ladies likewise score higher than men as far as administration abilities, comprehensiveness, and social affectability; accordingly (Troiano, 2014) organizations with ladies in the initiative will in general have progressively circumspect, comprehensive and profitable groups.
Richard et al, (2013) examined whether financial specialist sexual orientation is identified with hazard taking as uncovered in shared reserve speculation choices. They contend that ladies face less challenge taking choices than men in the latest, biggest, and least secure shared store venture choices (Richard et al, 2013). After governing for Phase, Edification, Salary as well as Asset Acquaintance, they discovered ladies show fewer hazard taking than males in their latest, biggest, and utmost hazardous shared store speculation choices.
The investigation by Gupta, (2019). evaluates the exhibition of the two people (Gupta, 2019). The discoveries from the examination further state that ladies likewise score higher than men as far as authority abilities, comprehensiveness, and social affectability; thus, organizations with ladies in the initiative will in general have increasingly kind, comprehensive, and profitable groups.
As to concentrate by Kebede, (2017). examines how the specialty units are extraordinarily affected by the sexual orientation assorted variety report higher figures for income and net benefit than units with less sex decent variety (Kebede, 2017). These advantages of sex assorted variety are intensified if the association has a profoundly drawn in and comprehensive workforce.
Essentially, Almor, (2019) found that ladies are fewer threat viewing for than men sovereign of commonality besides restraining, expenditures, or equivocalness (Almor et al, 2019). They moreover found that men in addition to ladies get various techniques in currency interrelated choice conditions, nevertheless that these procedures have no gigantic consequence on the aptitude to execute.
The examination by Eagly & Carli, (2009) states that Men approach more remarkable promoters and systems administration openings than ladies. Men hold most of the initiative situations in enormous associations and make casual systems that contain significant contacts, connections, and guides. The social associations inside these systems are basic to propelling vocations. Nonetheless, ladies are more averse to be welcome to partake in those systems due to the “like me” inclination (Eagly & Carli, 2009). This predisposition makes particular treatment representatives who are by and by or expertly like the evaluator. The “like me” inclination impacts the dominatingly male officials inside the system to enlist more youthful, aggressive men. Subsequently, ladies are frequently barred from those systems administration openings. These systems contain advocates, additionally alluded to as supporters. Men in places of intensity now and again advocate for other, more youthful men whenever authority openings emerge because of the expanded examples of predisposition. Subsequently, ladies need to apply extra endeavors to enter those systems and access amazing backers and vocation openings. In any case, ladies are now and then hesitant to invade those systems since they feel unwanted or awkward. Ladies’ avoidance from those systems, likely supporters and vocation openings restricts their professions. Because of these unjustly disseminated chances, men are appointed tasks that give higher deceivability to upper administration; those obvious tasks all the more regularly bring about authority openings. On the other hand, when ladies accomplish positions with high deceivability, they are frequently excessively assessed or censured in light of the circumstance that they are handily seeming among a gathering of homogenous, male companions. This subsequently suggests these inner mind predispositions and decisions limit ladies’ entrance to ground-breaking systems, advocates, amazing good examples, and exceptionally obvious tasks. Consistently, the underrepresentation of ladies in administration and compelling systems inside associations is frustrating the progression of more ladies into positions of authority.
In his examination, Ely, (2011) talk about the expanded utilization of methodologies when building up an authoritarian personality, youthful experts will in general copy or mirror pioneers to whom they can relate by methods for vocation way, decent variety gathering, or self-idea. Those pioneers are known as good examples. Because of a far-reaching absence of ladies in positions of authority in organizations, there are fewer female good examples than male good examples. Subsequently, young ladies who are building up their initiative characters have fewer choices than their male partners while choosing good examples to imitate (Ely, 2011). Also, good examples are significant for the maintenance of ladies in the workforce. The permeability of female good examples shields more youthful ladies from understood or unequivocal predispositions concerning ladies’ skill.
Carli, (2001) investigates the expanded social desires made by sexual orientation generalizations, the achievement is contrarily related to amiability or recruit capacity for ladies yet emphatically corresponded for men. This event makes extra, individual, and expert difficulties for ladies as they seek after administration in the working environment (Carli, 2001). Cultural fortifications support ladies of any age to seek after the generally simpler way of amiability and job congruity by staying inside the bounds of the female generalization.
The exploration by Nishii, (2013) broadcasts that groups having elevated levels of sexual orientation assorted variety have lower levels of contention also (Nishii, 2013). The examination further shows that associations with ladies in authority perform better than those without.
Also, Davis, (2014) portrays how the ladies’ input was not so much useful but rather closer to home than the men’s criticism; men’s basic criticism proposed the advancement of extra aptitudes, though ladies’ basic criticism included the two recommendations for improvement just as reactions about their character, disposition, and abrasiveness (Davis, 2014). This basic pattern in ladies’ criticism is demonstrative of the twofold tie that ladies experience when adjusting gentility and manliness in the working environment.
Subsequently, Eagly & Carli, (2009) investigate particular angles whereby ladies are tested with adjusting both female and manly qualities to be effective in authority (Eagly & Carli, 2009). Ladies are required to stay kind and public while likewise affirming them as able and solid.
The investigation by Sandberg, 2013) talks about how Women become less agreeable as they gain achievement and validity, however, the contrary marvel happens for men (Sandberg, 2013). On the other hand, ladies who are popular and performing inside the limits of their sexual orientation generalization are seen as bumbling and unequipped for expecting initiative.
Also, in his examination, Doyle, (2015) broadcasts those associations that are wealthy in sexual orientation decent variety pull in and hold more ladies (Doyle, 2015). In actuality, having ladies in the workforce is significant when organizations look to utilize, create, progress, and hold other ladies.
The exploration by Gupta, (2019). delineates that ladies are precisely spoken to in organizations’ workforces all in all yet are underrepresented in dynamically (Gupta, 2019), senior degrees of business initiative.
The discoveries revealed from the investigation of the Adams, (2014) investigates the increased ladies’ cooperation in the work power has had numerous ramifications for associations; the examination bolsters numerous advantages to sexual orientation decent variety in positions of authority (Adams, 2014). Organizations with more ladies in the initiative have better money related execution and a littler compensation hole than associations with fewer ladies in administration.
Larkin, (2011) analyzed the feminine portrayal of prosperity 500 businesses besides establish that a greater level of ladies on the leading body (Larkin, 2011) of Opulence 500 organizations are related to general moral and straightforward organizations.
The examination by Hewlett, (2013) disks a significant achievement factor basic putting lady in administration is coaching. A tutor furnishes their protégé with exhortation, direction, and backing (Hewlett, 2013). Mentorship pairings happen officially or casually inside organizations. Coaches and protégés commonly interface based on a mutual intrigue that is proficient, social, or potentially close to home.
Mill operator et al, (2009) considered the connection among racial and sexual orientation decent variety besides organization execution via binary go-between firm notorieties and development. For Affluence 500 they found that notoriety besides advancement together incompletely intervene the connection amid boarding ethnic decent variety besides firm execution as well as establishing a positive connection amid board sex assorted variety in addition to development (Mill operator et al, 2009).
Adams and Ferreira (2009) investigate the consequence of gender decent diversity on administration measurements and firm accomplishment. The creators find that lady’s chiefs are more antagonistic to have partaking matters than males. Ladies executives are likewise bound to sit on checking associated consultative assemblages than manlike chiefs (Adams & Ferreira, 2009). Precisely, females executives are bound to be allotted to analysis, designating, besides commercial organization boards of trustees.
The examination by Schlegel, (2000) investigates the need of the female coaches in giving direction to female protégés in regards to the working environment gives that go from badgering or separation to the challenges related to adjusting a family and profession (Schlegel, 2000). Strong coach connections encourage ladies’ route of expert, individual and political hindrances in the working environment; thus, tutoring is a sex decent variety activity that is significant for the turn of events and progression of ladies.
Díaz-García et al, (2013) analyze the upshot of board gender attired assortment on console forms in the Norwegian setting (Díaz-García et al, 2013). The creators locate an affirmative rapport amongst board sexy alignment varied variety and board vital control and a positive effect on board improvement exercises.
The examination by the Banks, (2009) depicts the sexual orientation assorted variety activity that shows up ordinarily in the writing is vocation arranging (Banks, 2009). Most huge organizations anticipate that representatives should expect responsibility for the profession arranging process, which includes setting targets and making techniques to accomplish short and long-haul vocation objectives.
Mill operator and Del Carmen Triana (2009) look at the effect of advancement and firm notoriety on the linking amid board sexy positioning decent diversity besides firm completing. The creators discover no joining amongst board gender’s assorted variation besides firm completing (Mill operator & Del Carmen Triana, 2009). Be that as it might, the outcomes show an affirmative linking among board sex’s assorted variation besides advancement.
Concerning concentrate by Early and Cazrli, (2009), ladies are urged to organize the requirements of others and are casually punished for advancing their advantages (Early & Cazrli, 2009). Further, the ladies have been socially disheartened from upholding for their own sake, and this sexual orientation-based socialization shows itself in ladies’ vocations.
Parola et al, (2015) analyze the connection between sexual orientation various sheets and financing or procurement choices (Parola et al, 2015). The creators discover proof in firms that proposes ladies do not display relative presumptuousness in noteworthy corporate dynamic contrasted with men.
As per the Pereira, (2012) study, in associations, female good examples engage other ladies and challenge preferential assumptions regarding ladies’ capacities in the workforce. The permeability of ladies in power urges other ladies to raise their very own and expert aspirations. Individual communication with authoritative good examples isn’t required for workers to get significance from their initiative model (Pereira, 2012). Along these lines, making permeability to female good examples is a key achievement factor for propelling more ladies into positions of authority.
Triana et al, (2013) inspect different firms to concentrate on how board sexy alignment decent assortment, firm accomplishment, and the intensity of lady’s executives’ interface to impact the measure of vital change. The creators find that if there should arise an occurrence of nonattendance of low firm execution danger and ladies’ chiefs having more noteworthy force, the effect of board sexy positioning decent variability on vital force is the best (Triana et al, 2013). Be that as it may, in the event of the nearness of low firm execution danger and ladies’ executives having more prominent force, the influence of board sex assorted variability on key force is the most negative.
Perrault (2015) examines how ladies on US sheets add to block adequacy by breaking every single male chief’s system. The creator finds that ladies executives upgrade the impression of the board’s instrumental, social, and good authenticity through genuine and emblematic portrayals (Perrault, 2015). This promptly expanded impression of the board’s reliability, which thus, encourages investors’ trust in the firm.
The exploration PricewaterhouseCoopers, (2009) depicts how the adaptable work courses of action empower work-life balance for working ladies and make more elevated levels of fulfillment, duty, and commitment among all representatives (PricewaterhouseCoopers, 2009).
Hagendorff & Keasey, (2012) look at whether sexual orientation assorted variety influences firm hazard utilizing an example of US firms (Hagendorff & Keasey, 2012) The creators locate that board with an advanced magnitude of feminine administrators is no attractive much threat compelling than an increasingly male-commanded board.
As per the Hewlett, (2013) study, it is unmistakably proved that male backers are bound to support people with whom they feel the most agreeable; therefore, their protégés are normally men, and ladies are rejected from systems administration openings, basic tasks or tasks, raises and advancements (Hewlett, 2013). Thusly, impartial promotion is another significant sexual orientation assorted variety activity when creating and propelling ladies.
Kravitz, (2003) contends that sexual alignment assorted variation makes an affirmative effect on firm worth in light of these reasons. Initially, a decent variety advances a greater understanding of the marketable epicenter, as it expands the possible clients and providers through market infiltration (Kravitz, 2003). Second, board assorted variety expands imagination and development. Furthermore, in conclusion, it upgrades the viability of corporate administration and advances powerful worldwide connections.
The investigation by Troiano, (2013) assesses the exhibition of the two people. The discoveries from the investigation further declare that ladies likewise score higher than men as far as administration capabilities, comprehensiveness, and social affectability; therefore, organizations with ladies in authority will in general have progressively chivalrous, comprehensive, and profitable groups (Troiano, 2013).
There are a few confinements to the exploration led in this paper. This paper endeavors to make up for this confinement by meeting ladies in the board just as Human Resources experts to gather a wide scope of applicable points of view (Boulouta, 2013). The organization documentation additionally adds to the representativeness of each case organization’s informational index. Also, the determination of case organizations for the examination was restricted to the associations that have been more than once perceived for their sexual orientation assorted variety of activities. Not all associations organize or keep up their open picture; therefore, there might be associations with model sex decent variety systems that stay unrecognized. Those associations couldn’t have been remembered for this examination. Thus, associations rejected from this examination are not sub-par compared to the case organizations and their sex decent variety systems. Following this examination, there are a few contemplations for future exploration (Nguyen et al, 2015). The extra examination could be finished for best practices for executing explicit sexual orientation assorted variety activities, for example, best practices for building up a worker asset gathering or formal coaching program.
Moreover, countless investigations could be led to decide associations’ present sexual orientation decent variety methodologies and their arrangement with the prescribed procedures distinguished in this paper. A few meeting respondents in beginning phases of their vocation expressed they’d encountered segregation based on age significantly more often than sexual orientation (Moser & Moser, 2005). Volumes of exploration have been directed about generational styles of working and thinking. For more youthful ages, what are the ramifications old enough based on segregation? In what manner will it influence people’s vocation ways? By what method will it influence their inner mind predispositions? While these prompts are inconsequential to best practices for setting ladies in administration, they repeated all through the informational indexes and could incite extra examination ventures.
Conclusion
From the investigation, it is presumed that associations are prepared to acknowledge sexual orientation decent variety incorporation in the working environment. Even though numerous approaches are made to run this procedure easily however there is the hole in the execution stage. Arrangements are there just in HR manuals in associations however the absence of appropriate usage and execution and persistent checking of these strategies and techniques influence the authoritative viability. Since because of no usage of overseeing sex assorted variety polices, more often than not workers choose to stop the association or they come up short.
References
Adams, S. (2014). Companies do better with women leaders (but women need more confidence to lead), study says. Forbes. com.
Almor, T., Bazel-Shoham, O., & Lee, S. M. (2019). The dual effect of board gender diversity on R&D investments. Long Range Planning, 101884.
Banks, C. H. (2006). Career Planning: Towards a More Inclusive Model for Women and Diverse Individuals. Online Submission.
Baskarada, S. (2014). Qualitative case study guidelines. Baškarada, S.(2014). Qualitative case studies guidelines. The Qualitative Report, 19(40), 1-25.
Berrien, J. (2014). Statement on the 50th anniversary of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
Bernardi, R. A., & Threadgill, V. H. (2011). Women directors and corporate social responsibility. EJB: Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organizational Studies.
Boulouta, I. (2013). Hidden connections: The link between board gender diversity and corporate social performance. Journal of business ethics, 113(2), 185-197.
Campbell, K., & Mínguez-Vera, A. (2008). Gender diversity in the boardroom and firm financial performance. Journal of business ethics, 83(3), 435-451.
Carli, L. L., & Eagly, A. H. (2001). Gender, hierarchy, and leadership: An introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 57(4), 629-636.
Colgan, F., & Ledwith, S. (Eds.). (2003). Gender, diversity, and trade unions: International perspectives. Routledge.
Chrobot-Mason, D., & Aramovich, N. P. (2013). The psychological benefits of creating an affirming climate for workplace diversity. Group & Organization Management, 38(6), 659-689.
Díaz-García, C., González-Moreno, A., & Jose Saez-Martinez, F. (2013). Gender diversity within R&D teams: Its impact on radicalness of innovation. Innovation, 15(2), 149-160.
Davis, K. (2014). The one-word men never see in their performance reviews. Fast Company, 27.
Doyle, E. (2015). Identifying Best Practices for Gender Diversity in Leadership Roles in the Workplace (Doctoral dissertation, Ohio University).
Dhir, S., Dhir, S., & Samanta, P. (2018). Defining and developing a scale to measure strategic thinking. foresight.
Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2009). Navigating the Labyrinth. School Administrator, 66(8), 10- 16…
Egan, M. E. (2011). Global Diversity and inclusion: fostering innovation through a diverse workforce. Forbes Insights, 1-20.
Ely, R. J., Ibarra, H., & Kolb, D. M. (2011). Taking gender into account: Theory and design for women’s leadership development programs. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 10(3), 474-493.
Gupta, A. (2019). Women leaders and organizational diversity: their critical role in promoting diversity in organizations. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal.
Heilman, M. E., & Eagly, A. H. (2008). Gender stereotypes are alive, well, and busy producing workplace discrimination. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1(4), 393-398.
Hewlett, S. A. (2013). Mentors are good. Sponsors are better. The New York Times, 14.
Hoffnung, M., & Williams, M. A. (2013). Balancing act: Career and family during college-educated women’s 30s. Sex roles, 68(5-6), 321-334.
Jayson, S. (2013). Men vs. women: how much time spent on kids, jobs, chores. USA Today.
Kebede, G. H. (2017). Gender Diversity in Management Positions and Organizational Performance: A Review of Literature. Management Studies and Economic Systems, 54(5805), 1-8.
Kravitz, D. A. (2003). More women in the workplace: is there a payoff in firm performance? Academy of Management Perspectives, 17(3), 148-149.
Moser, C., & Moser, A. (2005). Gender mainstreaming since Beijing: a review of success and limitations in international institutions. Gender & Development, 13(2), 11-22.
Oosthuizen, N., & Perks, S. (2019). The Enabling Conditions Necessary for Effective Online Mentoring: A Proposed Model. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC RESEARCH IN BUSINESS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, 9(6).
Nishii, L. H. (2013). The benefits of climate for inclusion for gender-diverse groups. Academy of Management Journal, 56(6), 1754-1774.
Nguyen, T., Locke, S., & Reddy, K. (2015). Does boardroom gender diversity matter? Evidence from a transitional economy. International Review of Economics & Finance, 37, 184-202.
Parole, H. R., Ellis, K. M., & Golden, P. (2015). Performance effects of top management team gender diversity during the merger and acquisition process. Management Decision.
Pereira, E. (2012). The role model effect: women leaders key to inspiring the next generation. Forbes, January, 19.
Perrault (2015), Hansen, E., Conroy, K., Topline, A., Bull, L., Kantar, A., & Panwar, R. (2016). Does gender diversity in forest sector companies matter? Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 46(11), 1255- 1263.
Richard, O. C., Kirby, S. L., & Chadwick, K. (2013). The impact of racial and gender diversity in management on financial performance: How participative strategy making features can unleash a diversity advantage. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 24(13), 2571-2582.
Sandberg, S. (2015). Lean in-women, work, and the will to lead.
Schlegel, M. (2000). Women mentoring women. Monitor on Psychology, 31(10), 33-36.
Sealy, R. H., & Singh, V. (2010). The importance of role models and demographic context for senior women’s work identity development. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(3), 284-300.
Şener, İ., & Karaye, A. B. (2014). Board composition and gender diversity: comparison of Turkish and Nigerian listed companies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150, 1002- 1011.Richard & Bernardi, R. A., & Threadgill, V. H. (2011). Women directors and corporate social responsibility. EJB: Electronic Journal of Business Ethics and Organizational Studies.
Smith, B. M., Duncan, F. E., Ataman, L., Smith, K., Quinn, G. P., Chang, R. J., … & Zelinski, M. B. (2018). The National Physicians Cooperative: transforming fertility management in the cancer setting and beyond. Future Oncology, 14(29), 3059-3072.Lilibeth et al, (2013).
Troiano, E. (2013). Why diversity matters. Catalyst Knowledge Center.
Kende, M. (2015). ICTs for inclusive growth: e-entrepreneurship on the open Internet. The Global Information Technology Report, 49-57.
Weaver, R., Ferguson, C., Welbourn, M., & Salamonson, Y. (2014). Men in nursing on television: exposing and reinforcing stereotypes. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70(4), 833-842.
Zenger, J., & Folkman, J. (2012). Are women better leaders than men. Harvard Business Review, 15, 80-85.