Introduction
It is important to note that in the contemporary environment, various styles of leadership can be applied. One of the common forms of leadership is through the incorporation of trait theory and behavioral theories. The other methods of administration involve the establishment of contingency theories of leadership. It is important to note that these two different theories of leadership are exceptional in the contemporary environment. The two approaches are, however, different. The difference is by comprehending what it is that they encompass. It is imperative to go through the gaps that theories have. Through this, it is possible to identify the strengths and weaknesses of each leadership theory. Consequently, determine the manner through which these leaders should approach.
Differences
The first theory to review and what it entails is the trait theory. According to the trait theory, some essential inborn characteristics set apart a leader from a non-leader. The personality traits are responsible for having a person carrying out practical work in the various posts accorded to lead. The trait theory is the implicit theory of leadership. Social physical and mental capabilities are what comprise the trait theory (Lee, 2018). The difference between the trait theory and the behavioral theories of leadership are relating to perception. Unlike the trait theory that believes in naturally born leaders, the theory states that a person can tr to act in a particular manner and consequently make an effective leader. According to this theory, a person might not have to train the essential characteristics of a leader. However, when a person is taken to a particular school or trained by another profession, they can learn how to lead effectively. The idea is opposite to what the trait theory teaches. It is also important to note that the behavioral theory rejects everything discussed, having a natural-born leader. The approach attracts many, for it widens their field of thought to allow themselves to comprehend the fact that they, too, can become leaders and influence others as expected.
There is also the difference between these styles and situational leadership. There is a wide range of leadership models that a person can employ. The methods go beyond the trait theories and behavioral theories, and this is from the manner that they might have different characteristics (Nawaz & Khan, 2016). However, it is essential to note that they do not exclude the two leadership theories identified. The difference is from the definition of situational leadership. The leadership style is virtually unstable. The reason for this is that there is the ability to see changes depending on the issue, the environment, or the maturity of the followers. It is from a comprehension of this matter that it is possible for a given setting to come up with the best style to employ. Situational leadership becomes independent as compared to the behavioral and trait theories.
Conclusion
As it is identified, there are different leadership styles, and they differ in theory depending on the setting. The trait theory depends on the idea that leadership is inborn and cannot be acquired virtually. The behavioral theory, on the other hand, believes that it is possible to gain leadership skills. Situational leadership is independent, and the reason for this is that it is flexible, depending on various issues.