This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers.
Uncategorized

Government and the Press

Pssst… we can write an original essay just for you.

Any subject. Any type of essay. We’ll even meet a 3-hour deadline.

GET YOUR PRICE

writers online

Government and the Press

Since the founding of the United States of America, citizens have shown fear over the ability of the government to limit the freedom of speech protected in the nation’s laws. This fear increased with the passing of the gag laws in 1931 by the state of Minnesota. The growth of the press has, however, enabled further outreach of information (Kansas City Law School, 2013).  However, there are times when the government has genuine concerns and must limit the freedom of the press or free speech to protect the safety of the nation.

In 1979, Howard Morland Published an article for the Progressive. However, the Department of Energy implored after the government deemed the probability of the release of state nuclear secrets a threat to national security. The US filed for an injunction against the newspaper before the publishing of the article, citing some provisions of the 1954 Atomic Energy Act (the United States v. The Progressive et al., 1979)). Therefore, the Progressive was forced to hold the publication until the hearing of the case. There were several hearings, both public and private, before the government officially withdrew the case.

The case drew a lot of media attention due to the freedom of speech nature. However, researchers agree that the injunction was necessary to protect the US atomic weapon secrets. The Progressive published the article six months with some modifications. However, at the time of publication, the government had produced a comprehensive nuclear coverage and defense system that was unavailable six months before. In this instance, the injunction protected the government’s nuclear power plan by ensuring that the author could not release the article before the plan was complete. At times, the right to security and life supersedes freedom of speech.

 

 

References

Kansas City Law School (2013). “Preliminary injunction ruling against The Progressive” University of Missouri. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20101203110750/http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/conlaw/progressive.html

The United States of America v. Progressive, Inc., Erwin Knoll, Samuel Day, Jr., and Howard Morland (1979). 467 F. Supp. 990 (W.D. Wis. 1979)

  Remember! This is just a sample.

Save time and get your custom paper from our expert writers

 Get started in just 3 minutes
 Sit back relax and leave the writing to us
 Sources and citations are provided
 100% Plagiarism free
error: Content is protected !!
×
Hi, my name is Jenn 👋

In case you can’t find a sample example, our professional writers are ready to help you with writing your own paper. All you need to do is fill out a short form and submit an order

Check Out the Form
Need Help?
Dont be shy to ask