Economic leveling up
According to source two, a fast-growing economy improves stress, dislocation, and ruin relationships. Due to this, people would rather spend at home with their partners to find happiness. It would be because the wealthy cannot afford the primary source of joy. Also, wealth will not aid in finding an excellent satisfying job or a partner. Additionally, source two intermingles with source one in this way, when people get enough money for use and settling expenses, they reach a point where wealth levels up. It happens after spending the money on improved life circumstances. People adopt their news ways of spending maybe at home with their partners and focus more on their relationships. After leveling up, the impact of getting reach becomes intense and challenging. It mostly causes emotional stress, and as the source states, trying to find the extra ten grand to replace and sort out contemporary issues becomes difficult. Therefore, these interconnected sentences form sub-arguments that answers the question, are more affluent people happier?
In source one, the idea that $50,000 can make rich people happy focuses on explaining details as a significant issue that could make people happy. It is described as a sizeable monetary value comparing a year. Also, there is an addition that this amount is enough to cover every issue one would wish to sort, ranging from bills and make fun of the much money. There is a prediction that searching that small rice in the percentage of the amount per annum is the only way that would make one unhappy. As a result, there is a clear revelation that much happiness would be found in the more money one has despite the searching of a small percentage. This is similar to source three, which analyses the annual requirement of the amounts that could make people happy. However, these yearly amounts are limited to paying bills, utilities, food, and the less that remains would go to saving. However, the statement states that more cash does not affect the well-being where emotional sake is considered. Theses two relate so that for happiness to be seen among the fatty, monetary availability should be a leading reason.
Additionally, the monetary availability is limited to a certain level, where, once it increases, happiness is re-installed. Additionally, source 4 adds support to the other two sources by comparing minimum records of a state’s income level. At this point, the economic status is taken to another level, the state level. Contrary to the satisfaction on an individual’s degree, the state economic leveling up would level the economy’s growth, meaning that a further increase economically would not affect the people’s satisfaction at all. However, the case would be different from the high wealthy individuals than fellow countrymen. It shows that the economic leveling up would be less useful to the rich people, supporting the other two sources. These create sub-arguments that drive to the main argument that rich people are happier.