Sherlock Holmes and the Ritual of Reason
The novel expresses the ideas of struggling nature between science and irrationality and superstition. The author of the book argues that through observations, individuals can overcome the evils instead of using the strength of the hands. As a result, people overcome the inhuman adversary by explaining what exists as supernatural by the scientific deductions. Equally, in some cases, activities that entirely depend on science could face some drawbacks due to psychic factors. The author explains that when such cases arise, the detective explores many things beyond exposing crimes activities and defeating criminals. Throughout the novel, Holmes’s method in dealing with crime encounters various tests of its effectiveness. Holmes entirely devotes himself to the science in daily activities as a detective but admits that trained individuals in the field of the science should encompass the ideas of supernatural in the explaining death of Sir Charles.
The case exists as a test on the Holmes personality as well as his method ion detective work. As witnessed from the novel, individual’s power like that of Holmes occurs as the world obvious things observed by the limited number of people. The heroism of Holmes originates from wonder and mystery due to refusal of acknowledging the other issues such as supernatural thing and entirely depending on the science in his work. Similarly, Holmes explains that investigations require verifiable facts but not rumours and legends to solve the arising cases. Equally, when the case gets handled scientifically, the more grotesque the incident, the more careful examination it requires which make the case more complicated. The author argues that supernatural can exist as an alternative inn investigation but never to occur as insistent. Moreover, if the impact of the rituals persists as reassuring, the scenarios require reassurance.
Despite science lacking the ability to test the supernatural worldview, in criminal investigations, it acts as a useful tool instead of supernatural. The investigator, in many cases such as murder, should follow the scientific and rational methods for the valid conclusion as compared when the supernatural techniques get employed. Moreover, spiritualism that comprises the supernatural system remains the widespread belief among many societies which influences other fields like science, religion as well as culture. Equally, in many cases, the supernatural can assist in solving many cases, but its influences remain unsolved hence science existing as a more effective tool in investigations. Furthermore, in detective fictions, the aspect of the supernatural always remains isolated from the central mystery hence not accounted. In the current era, the development in the technology directly or indirectly impacts the arguments of supernatural and science in different crime cases. For instance, as Holmes explains, investigations require facts but not rumors and legends. Notably, science offers a breakthrough in finding facts about the cases which include people involved and the type of incident.
Science covers a wide range of fields that leads to the provision of detailed information about the crime scene as compared to supernatural methods. Assessing the crime incident that comprises eyewitnesses requires logical activities instead of rumors hence investigators would require the psychology skill as well as forensic science in providing accurate information about the case. For instance, the Holmes discovery of Hugo’s portrait and his comments places the whole case in the biological context. In Conan Doyle’s novel, he presents Holmes as a precisely scientific detective. On the same note, Watson’s description of Holmes’s procedures in the investigation of the case indicates the activities of experimental science.