Healthcare services in the U.S and Germany
Health is an essential aspect for every nation as it propagates continuity and prosperity owing to an able crop of citizens. The national public healthcare services in the U.S and Germany regarding the health concern of Aging and Alzheimer’s primarily for the vulnerable population such as low-income individuals showcase similarities in the ethical implications and differences on issues concerning service delivery and funding.
Firstly, the United States engages the National Institute of Aging to handle federal public healthcare services in matters regarding Alzheimer’s and Aging. The establishment participates in research for the former ailment and develops treatment and preventive measures reflected in findings. The Medicaid programs come in handy for the vulnerable population such as low-income earners with the federal government assisting in financing and delivery of the personal health services. It is essential to note that the federal government achieves the drive through delegated powers, especially spending for the general welfare. The drive implies ethical consideration as the medicinal field requires equal treatment of individuals who seek the goods and service provision. Secondly, the German federal government emphasizes on health insurance for all parties to handle medical concerns, including Aging and Alzheimer’s. Statutory contributions incur the funding for the field. It is the mentioned aspect that ensures that all persons, including those challenged financially benefit as healthcare is free for all citizens. The public insurance cover hands the affiliated parties the capability to engage a private caregiver for service delivery rather than basing assistance on institutional grounds. The ethical implication is reflecting a positive and principled approach in healthcare as in the case of the U.S with equality and less costly attributes.
The U.S captures the use of the National Institute of Aging in handling issues related to health concerns of Aging and Alzheimer’s with funding through the federal government assisted by the Medicaid program in service delivery. The German case handles the situation through an emphasis on insurance with funding through statutory contributions. Both showcase ethical considerations as they reflect affordability and equality that benefits vulnerable populous such as low-income earners.