In the Met Museum, there is a piece of grading equipment and a Perl merchant scale. The material provides deeper insights into the essential industries situated in the Gulf region. The objects are displaying immense beauty and a classical novelty. However, they seem not to give the culture of Islam an excellent opportunity to be well elaborated. The two objects lack a common thread that connects them, and thus the display does not meet the stipulated goals. The presentation of the harks entirely isolated in the museum, therefore, remaining devoid of the cultural context. Its original value is consequently not recognizable. The exhibition does not allude to the degree of diversity in the Islamic culture. Therefore, it does not give a real picture of what transpired in ancient times. They seem to be customized to mimic the equipment in the past.
Another observation is a well decorated and colored textile material that has its origin in Nigeria. It is well stretched across all of the museum section. The size of the waistband, in my opinion, implies that the person who used to wear it was indeed corpulent. Those who regularly purchase the catalog would always be informed that it is a person of a regular size that use to put on the trousers. Typically, the picture depicts them as a gathered waist. The explanation that has been provided visually aids in providing a connection between the function that has been given and the appearance of the object. I was unable to understand the treason as to why the objects were grouped in the museum. The culture that prevailed can be demonstrated by the walking juxtaposition of the cane, the perpetual calendar, and the traditional wedding that is explicitly used at weddings. Therefore, these artifacts were generated on the new Islamic nations and never the remnants of the ancient Islamic era.