Research Scenarios
The statement that best describes the student’s error while describing the qualitative method is that meaning-making is not part of the qualitative research; instead, the student was supposed to focus on the focused narration in the explanation. However, the description induces the best theme that is required to be produced in the interpretation of the phenomenal world, thus making it more logical to the intended meaning and its purpose. For example, the insight into how the data are analyzed using an induced approach to facilitate a better presentation of the idea is critical. Nevertheless, I think that the student could have expanded the thesis of the word by producing the actual words that will reflect the primary purpose of the explanation. For instance, a quality research approach seeks to tell the story of a particular group’s experience in the context of their own words, mostly on the narration. Notably, the implicated mentioning of the thesis statement could have explained the explanation more attractively and more productive (Kroeker, Kordas, & Harley, 2017).
Quantitative research is limited only to the experimental design, whereas in a real sense, the investigation is compromised by so many factors before its actual implementation. In the student explanation, there were many gaps left hugging in the balance that needed more elaboration in the practical report. The student was supposed to be more open in explaining to enable a better understanding of the concept; for example, the research is not the data collection instrument. Still, he/she facilitates the collection of the data that they feel is logical in the study that is being conducted in the process. The student could have indicated the thesis of the statement to facilitate the reader of the concept to understand their line of explanation. The student failed to induce the central theme that elaborates and gives the stance explanation of the qualitative research; for example, they could have indicated the specific hypotheses and the inductive approach that the study employs in their interpretation.
Identifying gaps in the literature is not essential in the research. The leaner articulation of the response reasonably well explains the word, and they try to indicate the emphasis on the different areas that the scholar can use to bring about the literature review. However, the student failed to comprehensively make the reader understand the logic behind the literature review and the best comprehensive summary that it can make regarding the previous studies that have been done before regarding a specific theme. The student could have indicated the best ways to develop the literature review and make the adaption more effective in the case study that the individual is analyzing. Therefore basically, the literature review in my context could be the review that enumerates describe more prudentially and objectively evaluate the clarity of the previous research through giving the theoretical base for the research that has been conducted, thus helping the author to elaborate and determine the nature of the study in research.
This is an excellent description of the theory that is free from significant errors. The student was able to indicate the synopsis that is supposed to be in the theoretical framework described in the explanation, thus indicating the best ways that the researcher uses the context to understand the topic, thus having the ability to advance the theory for the next studiers. More so, the student’s implication that the arguments have the reciprocal relationship to the research is very in sighting as it provides the forum that helps the researcher advance their study in the future. Thus basically, the theoretical literature ensures the establishments of the existing theories that have been advanced before the investigation that was developed and the new hypothesis that will be tested to give the future reference of the study when the researcher is giving them more advancement of the research.
The explanation of the ethical considerations is free from the significant error. The students in this context were quite in sighting in their elaboration of the ethical consideration that is supposed to be imposed whenever the research is being conducted to facilitate a better and comprehensive ethical review. Notably what makes the insight more interesting is how the student dissipates that the investigation should consider the ethical concerns from the beginning of the study to the end by ensuring that they follow all the protocol required in the survey by safeguarding the data collected from the different areas needed for the data analysis. More so, the insight that the student indicates about ensuring that the research follows all the regulatory compliance is beneficial in the study as the researcher will at all levels avoid any occurrence that can contradict the regulation. I think the student could have added the information about the reoccupation that various research could experience if they fail to adhere to the ethical consideration required to be followed in the research progress.
The statement from the explanation of the introductions is free from significant errors. The student in this context has indicated the need to ensure that the researcher suggests the main them that will be emphasized in the research project that the researcher is conducting, thus helping them focus on the central issues that are more fundamental in the research process. More so, the student has indicated that the introduction is vital as it provides the heart of the research that is being conducted hence giving the process the better platform that will induce the prudential analysis. The student could have indicated the consequences that follow whenever the researcher fails to have the comprehensive introduction of the research project that they will be conducting by affecting the explanation of the different phenomena that the project could have followed.
The student’s explanation about the description of the statement problem is free from the significant error (Erdmann, &Schirrmeister, 2016). The student has elaborated the primary purpose of the statement that is effective in the research proposal by indicating how the report brings about the better emphasis on the research methodology and the alignment that the study will follow The student, therefore, suggested the purpose statement would implicate the primary goal that the research should develop to make it more comprehensive. I think the student could have also added the need for stating the objective of the study and the other phenomenal variables that are being investigated in the research project, thus providing the best framework that will guide the research process.
References
Erdmann, L., & Schirrmeister, E. (2016). Constructing transformative scenarios for research and innovation futures. Foresight.
Kroeker, K. J., Kordas, R. L., & Harley, C. D. (2017). Embracing interactions in ocean acidification research: confronting multiple stressor scenarios and context-dependence. Biology Letters, 13(3), 20160802.