Software-intensive systems
Software-intensive systems require stringent security protocols and functional capabilities that can streamline organizational processes seamlessly. Companies strive to standardize their business models and enhance consistency by developing enterprise systems that can automate routine tasks. Organizations with in-house development capabilities often have the upper hand when gathering the relevant statistics required for developing new systems (Creel & Ellison, 2004). On the other hand, firms that lack such capabilities are always compelled to outsource these services from hired experts.
Functionality and complexity expansion poses significant challenges for software developers that seek to develop dynamic systems that can adapt to various organizational changes (Bano & Ikram, 2010). This problem can be mitigated by establishing a competent team of in-house engineers dedicated to system development and maintenance. Outsourced experts are likely to omit vital input requirements that can undermine the system’s ability to accommodate the company’s survival’s radical changes. In-house developers often observe daily business practices and use subsequent data to identify areas that require necessary adjustments. Reiterating (Bano & Ikram, 2010), the complexity of acquiring the essential development tools increases with increased organizational usage dynamics.
Gathering accurate information required to establish the business rules also determines acquisition requirements. Misleading data is likely to undermine the project’s expectations since it will always give the wrong output. This means that the developed system might omit vital functionalities that can compromise the company’s daily routines. Analysts should involve the users by conducting interviews and administering questionnaires to gather the relevant information needed for developing the new system (Patanakul, Iewwongcharoen, & Milosevic, 2010). Existing business documents can also collect relevant information and ensure that the proposed project addresses all the identified loopholes in terms of security and performance.
The need to add or remove requirements during subsequent development phases largely depends on the compelling factors that necessitate such decisions (Burke, 2013). Project managers should always engage customers in every development phase to assess the project’s progress and determine whether necessary adjustments should be made. This can be successfully executed by deploying agile development approaches that allow relevant engineering changes throughout the development lifecycle.
Successful project management practices recommend the managers to establish detailed work breakdown structures that can measure substantial milestones. A poorly-developed worked breakdown structure can compromise the project’s success since the team will not know the specific tasks that must be accomplished within a specified timeframe (Patanakul et al., 2010). A comprehensive analysis of requirements specification is significant for developing a manageable work breakdown structure. This will facilitate in identifying various deliverables that should be implemented at specific development phases.
In conclusion, the underlying challenges in existing business processes often trigger the need for developing a new system in any organization. This requires detailed research to establish the most convenient protocols that can easily be modified to cope with emerging organizational needs. This paper has established that systems are primarily developed to solve specific needs by incorporating dynamic capabilities to enhance the company’s sustainability. The ever-changing market needs compel companies to strengthen their relevance and sustainability by adjusting business models to bridge the emerging gaps.