Responsibility
Responsibility can be drafted and depicted as the state by which one should complete a certain task or activity. Responsibility is shown to be an intrusive aspect and needs not to be pushed by the elements that exist within a foreign or an external domain. Such is the case that ideally occurs the role of a leader. Leaders are expected to depict themselves with the utmost dignity, and most of all, the push to see through that they achieve their responsibility to their people. It takes on a stronger aspect of patriotism in the fulfillment of such ideologies. Leaders are bound to show their commitment to their ruling regions in the way they take on their duties and how they serve their people. The depicted research question befalling this essay; What differentiates selfishness from the natural reaction?
Combated with the bounds of fear and reluctance, there is the push to remain unwilling to make certain steps and moves. However, there is also the aspect that such a domain is limited to see suit pertaining specifically to the roles that are being played by different individuals. A leader is depicted to make rulings and guide the environment of his people. Cowardice from such an individual would mean terror to the rest of the subjects. Such a state remains under the full domain and aspect of mercy. Together with his consultancies, a leader should be able to depict a way to combat any form of predicament and see-through that a resultant stop is made in such procedures altogether.
Prince Prospero depicts a case of pure arrogance towards his subjects. A factor in representing narcism is the domain that he maintains his happiness at all costs. Even at the expense of his rule and the issues that occur. He relaxes and takes the opposite path in curbing the predicament at hand. People are getting killed, and what he merely worries about is his happiness. Prospero takes on an inhumane attribution, especially when his state is being affected by such a difficulty. Personal pleasure is all he sees and visions for himself. He has no idea for his country nor the people and their lives.
He depicts a very odd and very uncivil way of going round such a pandemic. He comforts himself with the ideology of not having to think about the problems that are going around within his endeavors. The pandemic’s actual aspect of thinking was a factor that he evaded as he thought it would remain devastating to his happiness and lifestyle. On a much normal part and approach, such a move to ensure a pandemic would be that of unrest until an actual solution was reached. However, the bounds that take on such a case can only be listed to befall an aspect of selfishness and arrogance.
A form of natural reaction would be one that would take on a more concerning aspect. Turning a deaf ear and blind eye on what is happening within the environment’s bounds would be one of the last things to do. However, Prospero operates on a domain that could be termed to be an unnatural way of conducting certain aspects altogether. He tries to maintain his happiness by hiding from the fears that are hitting his nation. It’s more of an act of cowardice than it is a trait of a great leader altogether. In a bid to comfort himself, he took on the step of having to invite some of his friends so that they could make merry together.
Even though there was no known cure for the Read Death, the prince still could find ways by which he would control it. He also had the obligation of giving hope to his subjects, as this was one of his roles as a leader. A nation without hope is bound to fall. The fact that he could have done something rather than enjoy himself places him at a position of being called an incompetent leader altogether.
To conclude, it becomes clear that Prince Prospero depicts a more selfish reaction to the situation that affected his nation. The natural response would not have been that of secluding himself from the rest of the people just to have fun. It would ideally revolve around a more responsible action of ruling with example.