Q.1
The history of courts from Anglo-Saxon times to modern-day is rich in the development of legal institutions. Perchance, it symbolizes the dawning on modern reversion to reference of court in the olden days. Anglo-Saxon is an excellent example of such regression. It is defined as a body of established principles used in England starting from the 6th century to the Norman Conquest (1066). The Scandinavian law was part of legal evolution during the time of Anglo-Saxon. The chiefs had a more significant role in case determination because they were not courts of record like the new courts.
The courts were divided into two classes, ‘ namely private court and ancient communal courts. Some of the cases that have influenced modern-day legal institutions are the Madison legal case of 1803 in which the US Supreme Court lured that a congress Act was unconstitutional and Gibbons v. Ogden (1824).
The current laws have been formed from a stock of Teutonic customs with added modification from Roman and Germanic elements.
In modern courts, the law states what wrong is and provide a remedy for every offense committed with records for reference. This method is different from Anglo-Saxon time.
Q.2
A jury is a group of legal people selected to lender verdict in a dispute. Terms used by the board include allegation, acquittal, and arraignment.
The allegation is something someone claims to have happened while acquittal is when the defender is found innocent and sent free. Besides, arraignment is presenting the accused before the court.
Q.3
Many traditional courts lacked a clear hierarchy of command whereby decisions were made based on accepted social standards in a given community as opposed to the modern-day where there are clearly defined rules and regulations governing all aspects of life.
Q.4
Trial courts listen to cases for the first time while the appellate court listens to disputes from lower when the defendant or the plaintiff is not satisfied with the court decision. In the olden days, majority jurisdictions had a trial court with no appellate proceeding.