Briefing Paper
Table of Contents
Purpose 3
Next Steps 11
Conclusion 14
References 17
Introduction
Hand hygiene is a significant intervention that is also financially useful to ensure health and sustainability within the healthcare settings in the UK. However, the practices of hand hygiene among healthcare workers and professionals globally remain unsatisfactorily low. The methods of contamination control have been initiated for ages, and even before, hand hygiene has been focused within the therapeutic and nursing programs and policies (Andriani and Nadjib, 2018). Lately, progressively advantageous and less polished handwashing items have been presented, combined with published rules to support hand hygiene consistency in the UK. Regardless of evidence that the healthcare settings acquired infections cause enormous mortality, and can effortlessly be prevented by the reasonable and direct practice of appropriate hand hygiene, reviews depict that the healthcare professionals on a frequent basis don’t meet targets. This is due to several factors such as low level of prioritization, spare time, the burden of the equipment of handwashing, not much tolerance towards antiseptics as well as absence of initiative. The present briefing paper features vital elements to think about when creating methodologies for improving hand hygiene in healthcare settings in the UK, in light of WHO rules as well as the policy of WaterAid along with the programmatic encounters (Andriani and Nadjib, 2018).
Purpose
Excellent hygiene is essential to make sure that healthcare professionals give quality consideration, decrease the spread of diseases while ensuring community strength. The present paper centres primarily around hand hygiene yet perceive the role of great cleanliness; contamination counteractive action and control along with the facilities of water and sanitation to accomplish a sheltered, clean healthcare condition. Healthcare-associated infections (i.e., HCAI), which is developed because of presentation to healthcare facilities or methodology, bring about 8-12,000 deaths yearly in the UK. The absolute most significant factor in the avoidance of HCAI is appropriate to hand hygiene (Blumstein, 2014). In any case, in spite of the focus set close on hand hygiene, several studies have shown that healthcare experts usually neglect to utilize legitimate hand hygiene in everyday practice. The healthcare expert’s failure to consent to authoritative hand hygiene guidelines is a significant ethical problem (Blumstein, 2014).
Summary of the Facts
Background
Fair, comprehensive, and sustainably resilience access towards the water, sanitation, as well as hygiene (also referred to as WASH) is a fundamental part of conveying quality health care. Hand hygiene among professionals and workers is especially important to decrease the transmission of infection, averting HCAIs, handling any antimicrobial resistance and eventually improving the wellbeing results of patients (Bouzid, Cumming and Hunter, 2018). Regardless of this, consistence with hand-hygiene guidelines among professionals and workers globally is worryingly very low. An orderly survey of investigations directed in emergency clinics in the UK assesses an average hand-hygiene consistence pace of 40 per cent among the healthcare professionals and workers (Bouzid, Cumming and Hunter, 2018). This is believed to be even lower in many regional areas of the country, with specific examinations detailing consistence rates as low as 2.1 per cent (Kelly et al., 2015). Poor hand hygiene among workers and professionals in the UK is expected to some extent to lack access to, and utilization of the WASH policy benefits in healthcare settings. The latest report with information from higher than 66,000 healthcare settings crosswise over Uk features the large holes in access to WASH over various degrees of the global health framework (Kelly et al., 2015).
It has been recognized that in the absence of access to WASH, the healthcare workers can’t keep up satisfactory hand hygiene. Straightforward entry to materials including cleanser, water or alcohol-based hand rubs at the purpose of care is essential to improve consistency among such healthcare settings. Moreover, current factors for observing WASH in healthcare settings in the UK likely disparage the size of the issue in the country, considering that they don’t thoroughly calculate the quality, amount and usefulness of these services. Poor hand hygiene among healthcare professionals introduces a genuine risk to the safety of the patients, especially regarding HCAIs. Despite the immediate and prompt effect on mortality and morbidity, HCAIs can bring about long term disabilities, delayed staying at the medical clinics and unnecessary expenses for patients, families and healthcare frameworks. The global health weight of HCAIs remains to a great extent unknown because of constrained reliable information; notwithstanding, evidence from the UK shows that HCAIs influence more than 40 lakhs patients consistently, resulting in 16 million additional days in a clinic as well as 37,000 deaths every year. In monetary terms, this outcome is roughly 7 billion euros every year within direct healthcare-associated expenses alone (Longuenesse et al., 2017). The scale and effect of HCAIs in the UK are believed to be considerably higher, given the significant human and budgetary limitations confronting healthcare frameworks in these settings. Evidence obtained from one investigation has demonstrated that contaminations acquired in ICUs are at any rate 2-3 folds higher in the UK as compared to other countries, showing enormous differences between countries of different economic status (Longuenesse et al., 2017). Furthermore, the nonappearance of appropriate WASH provisions and the resulting infection risk can add to the enhanced utilization of the antibiotics, in this way, adding to the developing threat of resistance of anti-microbes.
Current Status
A healthcare setting without adequate practices on hygiene supplies can’t give excellent care. Global health centres face severe difficulties in cultivating clean conditions for their patients. An investigation of WASH in the UK found that 38 per cent didn’t have an improved water source, 19 per cent needed sanitation settings, and 35 per cent neglected to offer cleanser and water for handwashing(McCay, 2015). Failure to watch the protocol of hygiene limits the conveyance of safe services improves the probability of HCAI and permits anti-toxin resistant microorganisms to spread. WHO recognized that around 61 percent on an average of healthcare workers and professionals in certain settings and up to 90 percent don’t hold fast to the best handwashinghandwashing practices, in any event, when supplies are accessible (McCay, 2015). Poor methods of hand hygiene add to higher paces of HCAIs, the improved danger of antimicrobial opposition/resistance (i.e., AMR), and the intensified weight on healthcare frameworks which results from HCAIs and AMR (McGoldrick, 2015). HCAIs are contaminations created during care or treatment in a healthcare setting. Prevalence in the UK is assessed at 7-15.5 per cent (McGoldrick, 2015). HCAIs delay the time of recovery, as well as the patients, stay at the healthcare settings, bringing about the handicap, enhanced medical expenses, and creates life-related risks for patients. Around 56 percent of neonatal deaths among babies conceived in emergency clinics is because of contamination, and poor disease counteractive action practices place infants in the UK at the especially high-risk association for HCAIs and other infections (McGoldrick, 2016).
Unhygienic conditions, constrained accessibility of hand hygiene supplies, deficient medicinal waste transfer, the poor practice of hand hygiene, and inadequate equipment in HCFs cultivate a situation ideal for the spread of disease. Improved hand hygiene has been appeared to diminish HCAI spread by 40 per cent, and full consistence can decrease the danger of obtaining methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (i.e., MRSA), a typical reason for severe diseases in HCFs, up to 24 per cent (McGoldrick, 2017). Such type of resistance happens when microorganisms change and become resistant towards the medications used to treat them. The AMR presents an immediate risk to the safety of the patient and has decreased the viability of medicines used to treat HCAIs and other ailments, including tuberculosis and pneumonia. Currently, 0.7 million deaths every year are related to AMR, and it is assessed that by the year 2050, protection from antimicrobial medicines will be the reason behind the deaths of 10 million individuals every year (McGoldrick, 2017). By 2030, around 700 billion dollars in healthcare costs will be related to AMR, except if the extra venture is carried out (McMichael, 2019). Appropriate hand hygiene practice at valuable minutes within HCFs could help in diminishing the spread of microscopic organisms that are drug-resistant and reducing contamination rates, prompting lower anti-toxin remedy rates (McMichael, 2019). Hand hygiene interventions have been demonstrated to be powerful in decreasing resistant contaminations in clinics, supported by a model that assessed that each expansion of 1 per cent close by hand hygiene consistency could spare about 40,000 dollars within healthcare costs associated with MRSA every year in an emergency clinic setting in the UK (Njuangang, Liyanage and Akintoye, 2018). The impacts of poor hand hygiene in HCFs trouble healthcare frameworks and improves the resource requirements. HCAIs can build the length of stay in clinics by five days to a month for patients who develops contaminations during their visits (Njuangang, Liyanage and Akintoye, 2018). High HCAI pervasiveness can produce requirements consisting of medicinal supply deficiencies and decreased the productivity of staff; these can force huge expenses on healthcare frameworks. Diseases obtained during hospitalization can likewise bring about litigation expenses, lost working time, and other pointless consumptions that cost as much as 19 billion dollars annually (Rousham, 2016). Low consistency to cleanliness standards bargains with the capacity to offer safe services in the UK. Contamination counteractive action and control (counting hand hygiene) is a WHO standard for improving quality consideration for moms and infants in healthcare settings. Lack of cleanliness in healthcare settings could have an undermining effect on the community’s trust. It additionally decreases the limit of specialists to react to developing healthcare crisis and constraining the resilience of healthcare systems. Appropriate hand hygiene can help in stopping the spread of infectious outbursts, for example, Ebola in the meantime, protecting healthcare workers and professionals from gaining or transmitting the infection (Rousham, 2016).
Key Considerations
Hand cleanliness is generally viewed as the essential measure to decrease HCAIs and has direct applications for the quality and security of services being provided. In that case, poor hand hygiene limits the progress towards accomplishing Universal Health Coverage (i.e., UHC). The WHO’s meaning of UHC incorporates three goals that consist of access equity, service quality, as well as monetary risk security (Sunkesula et al., 2015). As improper hand hygiene bargains the capability of healthcare workers or professionals to convey quality care, UHC won’t be acknowledged without conquering boundaries to good practice of hand hygiene. The recent WHO Guidelines on hand hygiene in healthcare settings suggested the latest evidence-based recommendations for hand hygiene. The guidelines express that the workers or professionals should wash their hands using cleanser and water or utilize an alcohol-based hand rub. The WHO’s ‘5 moments of hand cleanliness’ idea depends on evidence that the transmission of infections can be counteracted if healthcare professionals practice hand hygiene at five crucial points in time (Rousham, 2016).
In spite of considerable evidence of sustainable health effects and the accessibility of global direction, interpreting hand-hygiene guidelines into training is a relentless test. The components that impact ideal hand hygiene practices are complicated as well as multifaceted while they focus on being incorporated at individual and framework level, and regional, religious as well as social contemplations. A large number of the critical limitations are featured in WHO’s recent guidelines based on hygiene consisting of the following: (Sunkesula et al., 2015)
Infrastructure- The compliance in terms of hand hygiene needs sufficient cleanliness resources at the opportune time and right area, for example, the accessibility of handwashing stations, water, and cleanser, or alcohol-based hand rubs. Appropriate availability towards WASH is a specific test in resource-poor settings, combined with numerous healthcare settings without the foundation and items to practice proper hand hygiene in the UK.
Inadequate time- In healthcare facilities with insufficient monetary and workforce resources, the absence of time is a significant self-detailed limitation towards proper hand hygiene.
Different consistency among various units of healthcare professionals- Healthcare professionals have regularly suggested having observed lower paces of hand hygiene consistence contrasted with medical attendants, even though this differs among investigations and settings. In the UK, hand-hygiene consistency was most elevated among medical attendants ( up to 72.9 per cent) contrasted with specialists (around 59.7 per cent) after a hand hygiene intervention (Sunkesula et al., 2015). However, in some areas, the reverse relationship was seen when specialists demonstrated a lot higher consistency than medical caretakers (i.e., 20.3 per cent and 4.4 per cent) (Sunkesula et al., 2015).
Therapeutic glove use: The utilization of gloves by healthcare workers and professionals is prescribed to decrease the risk of infecting hands and to decrease the risk of spreading germs. There is worry anyway that wearing gloves may affect the specialist’s consistency with hand hygiene guidelines, despite the fact that the evidence isn’t complete. This is likely that the professionals feel satisfactorily secured wearing gloves and along these lines don’t want to wash their hands. The utilization of gloves ought not to replace the usage of cleanser and water, and it is suggested that hand hygiene be performed with glove use.
Skin responses: Repeated practice of hand-hygiene has been related to improved skin responses to water and disinfectants, which can discourage the professionals from washing their hands regularly.
Behavioural considerations: Hypotheses related to behaviour feature that hand-hygiene practices are built up throughout everyday life, and in this way, influence frames of mind and behaviour all through life. It is recommended that hand hygiene and elective hand hygiene are affected by various components. It is the constituent component of hand hygiene which is likely the most inconsiderable by healthcare workers or professionals since it’s anything but natural behaviour and should be learned.
Considering a large number of components affecting the practices of hand-hygiene among healthcare professionals, improving consistency requires vital focusing on various activities and practices. The WHO Multimodal hand hygiene enhancing methodology was created as a useful instrument to help execute the WHO Guidelines based on hand-hygiene in healthcare settings of the UK and was tried in various other nations around the globe to survey its possibility and quality. Experience from the UK features the accomplishment of this methodology in building up a hand-hygiene intervention in medical clinic settings, which brought about the usage of the procedure at the national level. While much is comprehended about the limitations to hand-hygiene consistency, less is thought about the adequacy of various efficiency to address these. A Uk-based review of the most recent study gives a few bits of knowledge on what approaches have demonstrated viable in healthcare settings (Weber et al., 2018).
As stated in the literature, multimodal interventions are commonly more potent than single-effective methodologies, moreover, figuring out which single factors are best to test is complicated. The significance of focusing on a wide range of behavioural determinants of hand-hygiene consisting of those less ordinarily suggested, for example, social impact, the frame of mind, self-adequacy, and goal was likewise identified. Sustainable health change won’t be accomplished without thought of existing limitations, consisting of social as well as the management structures inside healthcare settings. Structuring key intends to beat these limitations at various levels with an emphasis on social advertising, authoritative help, feedback, and checking, and stakeholder association and initiative, are found to add to helpful interventions (Weber et al., 2018). Electronic gadgets are helpful instruments in giving longterm checking and criticism of consistency, and going about as an obvious update for healthcare workers. Innovative behavioral change interventions created through developmental research could give significant methods of affecting hand-hygiene consistence. For instance, the positive abnormality approach was people who deal with the issue however handle it more successfully than their friends are urged and often provided support to decide the arrangements and impact other staff and the professionals have with their very own plans to improve consistency (Weber et al., 2018).
WaterAid perceives the essential requirement for fair, comprehensive and sustainable access to WASH in healthcare settings in the UK to convey quality medicinal services and achieve broad inclusion objectives by 2030 (Fred, 2015). WASH in such environments is an essential area for many years, of which hand-hygiene is an important segment. WaterAid would provide support to the country to create suitable arrangements, guidelines, and policies to improve WASH in healthcare settings. Some portion of it would incorporate distinguishing critical blockages and chances to fortify existing frameworks, and support and construct healthcare framework ability to lead efforts of this issue. Somewhere in the range of 2016-2019, WaterAid as a team with Soapbox (and with the help provided by the UK government as funds), will work to improve WASH benefits in healthcare communities and settings (Fred, 2015). In 2015, Soapbox was recognized to lead a supported investigation to build up a novel intervention focused on enhancing hand-hygiene during and after healthcare setting births (Fred, 2015). Hand-hygiene is additionally a key component in the Soapbox instructional pamphlet which has been created for local administrations staff or cleaners in the UK; this is a disregarded unit of the workforce notwithstanding its crucial job in keeping up natural cleanliness and resilience in healthcare settings (Fred, 2015).
Next Steps
Compelling and maintainable advancements in hand hygiene in healthcare facilities are a continuous challenge, needing activity at numerous levels consisting of research, policy, as well as programming. Based on recommendations suggested by WHO and those highlighted within the literature, several regions for future research have been distinguished, alongside essential arrangement and automatic approaches that countries like the UK could practice for overcoming barriers (Sunkesula, Kundrapu and Donskey, 2015).
Despite expanding evidence for successful hand-hygiene interventions including multimodal methodologies and foundation enhancement, quality of investigating remains a boundary to advising evidence-based suggestions and driving policy to alter. Future steps ought to be fortified in zones counting:
Resource-poor settings- Generally, some research is conducted in resource-poor settings. Next steps ought to explore diverse techniques for hand hygiene advancement in these settings. This would incorporate examining the effect of social practices on hand-hygiene behaviour and the utilization of hand-hygiene items. Besides, it would include setting up the foremost fitting strategy to keep water secure for utilizing, counting hand hygiene, when put away at the point of care.
Economic assessments: There’s a requirement for more cost-effectiveness examinations of progressing hand hygiene in resource-poor settings. This might incorporate assessments of presenting alcohol-based hand rub.
Health results: Research to evaluate the effect of progressed hand hygiene in terms of pathogenic results will be relevant to educating policy as well as practice, in specific, to decide the total improvement in hand hygiene adherence needed to attain unsurprising risk decrease in disease rates.
Multidisciplinary investigate: Researches, including hypothetical systems based on behavioural and social policies, utilizing mixed-method strategies and including nearby professionals, as well as policymakers, are required to recognize viable interventions.
Other investigate: Extra investigate considerations incorporate deciding the impact of the quality as well as the water temperature on viable hand hygiene, and distinguishing the determinants of handwashing behaviour through developmental examine. Future scholarly investigate ought to prioritize vigorous randomized controlled trials, which have a satisfactory follow-up period to decide maintainable best practices.
Policy needs
Based on writing as of now accessible, beside automatic encounter, various suggestions are highlighted to get over a few of the key boundaries with respect to accessibility to WASH in healthcare facilities. These incorporate: (Sunkesula, Kundrapu and Donskey, 2015)
Strengthening social arrangements and plans: Nations such as the UK with national plans and policies input for WASH in healthcare settings have a greater extent of settings with working water frameworks, usually demonstrating a vital component in moving forward healthcare settings.
Healthcare setting based risk evaluations: Systematic recognizable evidence of rusks considers proper administration and prioritization of restricted WASH services, especially for the time being, while long term infrastructural upgrades are arranged.
Preparing staff: Sufficient preparing of healthcare professionals and workers on WASH close by preparing on disease control and avoidance including when to convey WASH messages towards patients is fundamental to improve hand-hygiene, while additionally guaranteeing risk management systems are actualized.
Checking: The advancement of an arrangement of markers on WASH benefits in healthcare settings in the UK is necessary to decide to get to, equity, health, and resilience. Moreover, reinforcing national health management data frameworks to remember WASH for routine checking of services is fundamental to powerful observing of progress.
Behavioural change interventions: Designing compelling behavioural change interventions through an imaginative procedure educated by developmental research, and execution utilizing novel methodologies, could substantially improve handwashing consistency in settings.
Advocacy: The improvement of key advocacy messages to explicit patients, consisting of evidence of the health and monetary effect of hand-hygiene, manufactures interest for key WASH benefits in healthcare settings in the UK by health experts, patients, as well as communities.
Conclusion
Hand-hygiene is a significant factor like healthcare settings and patient security broadly in the UK. The issue of hand-hygiene in healthcare settings has numerous uncertain problems that require further research to illuminate approaches and programming. Tending to the issues identified with research, strategy, and programming featured in this briefing paper will be essential to advise evidence-based accepted procedures in the UK. The evidence overwhelmingly underpins the requirement for a multifaceted way to deal with improve hand-hygiene consistency, focusing on various boundaries and practices at the same time. Inside this, it is essential that foundation issues identified with access to sufficient and practical WASH benefits in medicinal services facilities stay at the centre of each effort to enhance hand-hygiene. The inability to gain ground here will seriously bargain in different endeavours to improve hand-hygiene.
Recommendations
Improving hand-hygiene in healthcare settings requires supported activity on different levels to improve information, skills, and inspiration, supplies and framework, and the empowering approach condition. The procedures recorded underneath remain to add to policies, conventions and focuses on that organize centre IPC and cleanliness models, giving direction to healthcare frameworks for medicinal services policymakers (Sunkesula, Kundrapu and Donskey, 2015).
Policy
- Establishing finances for cleanliness in healthcare settings that guarantees resources support the consideration of handwashing foundation into healthcare plan and the usage of IPC procedures and programming.
- Strengthening the checking frameworks and institutionalize streamlined cleanliness markers into national healthcare evaluations and observation to advise, adjust, and approve HCAI revealing systems.
- Development and execution of medicinal services methodologies that perceive the connections between the hidden causes and drivers for hygiene-related behavioral change, consolidating key parts into HCF programming.
- Employ accreditation frameworks to order and uphold least facility structure, development, and support prerequisites for HCFs, including handwashing stations at basic focuses.
Infrastructure
- Working with accomplices, for example, the private segment, to create supply-fastens for access to minimal effort cleanliness supplies.
- Ensuring cleanliness items that counteract germ spread (e.g., careful gloves, hand cleanser or hand rub, disinfectants) are accessible and utilized in HCFs, and guarantee the neatness of provisions, equipment, and foundation.
- Ensuring access to basic cleanliness benefits and look after equipment (e.g., handwashing stations), and assurance that facilities are available to all clients, incorporating individuals with inabilities.
- Ensuring all HCFs approach fundamental WASH facilities or propelled settings if national rules exist.
Healthcare Facility
- Implementation of the 5 segments of the WHO multimodal way to deal with hand hygiene improvement dependent on drivers of hand hygiene consistence: framework change, preparing and instruction; perception and criticism; updates in the work environment; and a culture of wellbeing.
- Providing normal preparing and conduct change interventions on hand hygiene and IPC to all staff and volunteers working in medicinal services settings. Guarantee staff have the capabilities expected to avoid, screen, and perceive HCAIs.
- Integrating center cleanliness consistency as a feature of a complete IPC approach, and guarantee that office executive and IPC advisory groups have the power to strengthen IPC procedures when HCFs face understaffing, stuffing, constrained stockpile inclusion, and health or natural emergencies.
- They are providing patients with data to their right side to get care from a medicinal services workers with clean hands.
- Encouraging the workers to utilize important behavioural change draws near and circulate essential items that can advance stable handwashing behavior inside and past wellbeing setting (Sunkesula, Kundrapu and Donskey, 2015).
References
Andriani, Y. and Nadjib, M. (2018). The Importance of Implementation of Hand Hygiene Practice in Reducing Healthcare-associated Infections: A Systematic Review. KnE Life Sciences, 4(9), p.135.
Blumstein, S. (2014). Improving Hand-hygiene Compliance and Reducing Healthcare Associated Infections with Automated Hand-hygiene Compliance Monitoring. American Journal of Infection Control, 42(6), pp.S117-S118.
Bouzid, M., Cumming, O. and Hunter, P. (2018). What is the impact of water sanitation and hygiene in healthcare facilities on care seeking behaviour and patient satisfaction? A systematic review of the evidence from low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ Global Health, 3(3), p.e000648.
Fred, H. (2015). Banning the Handshake from Healthcare Settings Is Not the Solution to Poor Hand Hygiene. Texas Heart Institute Journal, 42(6), pp.510-511.
Kelly, J., Blackhurst, D., Steed, C. and Diller, T. (2015). A response to the article, “Comparison of Hand Hygiene Monitoring Using the My 5 Moments for Hand Hygiene Method Versus a Wash in-Wash out Method”. American Journal of Infection Control, 43(8), pp.901-902.
Longuenesse, C., Lepelletier, D., Dessomme, B., Le Hir, F. and Bernier, C. (2017). Hand dermatitis: hand hygiene consequences among healthcare workers. Contact Dermatitis, 77(5), pp.330-331.
McCay, L. (2015). Emotional motivators might improve hand hygiene among healthcare workers. BMJ, p.h3968.
McGoldrick, M. (2015). Hand Hygiene and Clostridium Difficile Infections. Home Healthcare Now, 33(6), pp.340-341.
McGoldrick, M. (2016). Hand Hygiene Products and Supplies. Home Healthcare Now, 34(7), p.396.
McGoldrick, M. (2017). Hand Hygiene in the Home Setting. Home Healthcare Now, 35(8), pp.454-455.
McMichael, C. (2019). Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) in Schools in Low-Income Countries: A Review of Evidence of Impact. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(3), p.359.
Njuangang, S., Liyanage, C. and Akintoye, A. (2018). The history of healthcare facilities management services: a UK perspective on infection control. Facilities, 36(7/8), pp.369-385.
Rousham, E. (2016). Hand hygiene infrastructure and behaviours in resource-limited healthcare facilities. Journal of Hospital Infection, 94(3), pp.284-285.
Sunkesula, V., Meranda, D., Kundrapu, S., Zabarsky, T., McKee, M., Macinga, D. and Donskey, C. (2015). Comparison of hand hygiene monitoring using the 5 Moments for Hand Hygiene method versus a wash in–wash out method. American Journal of Infection Control, 43(1), pp.16-19.
Sunkesula, V., Kundrapu, S. and Donskey, C. (2015). Response to the Letter to the Editor regarding Comparison of hand hygiene monitoring using the My 5 Moments for Hand Hygiene method versus the Wash In-Wash Out method. American Journal of Infection Control, 43(8), p.902.
Weber, N., Martinsen, A., Sani, A., Assigbley, E., Azzouz, C., Hayter, A., Ayite, K., Baba, A., Davi, K. and Gelting, R. (2018). Strengthening Healthcare Facilities Through Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene (WASH) Improvements: A Pilot Evaluation of “WASH FIT” in Togo. Health Security, 16(S1), pp.S-54-S-65.