| Course Code | Class Code | | | | |
| NRS-410V | NRS-410V-O503 | | | | |
| Week 3. Elimination. Mr. C | | | | | |
| Criteria | Percentage | Excellent (100.00%) | Comments | Points Earned | |
| Content | 80.0% | | | | |
| Clinical Manifestations of Mr. C. | 10.0% | Subjective and objective clinical manifestations are detailed. The clinical manifestations are accurate and clearly report the observed and perceived signs and symptoms. | | | |
| | | | | |
| Potential Health Risks for Obesity and Bariatric Surgery | 10.0% | A detailed discussion of the potential health risks for obesity is presented. A through and compelling discussion on whether bariatric surgery is an appropriate intervention is presented. The discussion is well-developed and supported by evidence and additional rationale. | | | |
| | | | | |
| Functional Health Patterns | 15.0% | Five or more actual or potential problems identified from the functional health patterns are discussed. The discussion is insightful, and the identified problems are highly relevant for the patient and his condition. The discussion is well-supported by rationale and evidence. | | | |
| | | | | |
| Staging and Contributing Factors of End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) | 10.0% | The staging of ESRD and the contributing factors for ESRD are explained. The information is accurate and reflects contemporary practice and research. | | | |
| | | | | |
| Health Promotion and Prevention for ESRD | 20.0% | Patient education for the prevention of future events, health restoration, and avoidance of deterioration of renal status is thoroughly described. The proposed items are clearly presented and highly relevant and supportive of patient and his health status. Strong evidence and rationale generally support the discussion. | | | |
| | | | | |
| Resources for ESRD Patients for Nonacute Care and Multidisciplinary Approach | 15.0% | A clear and detailed explanation on the types of resources available for ESRD patients for nonacute care, and the beneficial types of multidisciplinary approaches, is presented. The explanation demonstrates insight into both resources and multidisciplinary approaches for nonacute care for ESRD patients. | | | |
| | | | | |
| | | | | |
| Organization, Effectiveness, and Format | 20.0% | | | | |
| Thesis Development and Purpose | 5.0% | Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. | | | |
| | | | | |
| Argument Logic and Construction | 5.0% | Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. | | | |
| | | | | |
| Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) | 5.0% | Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. | | | |
| | | | | |
| Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) | 2.0% | All format elements are correct. | | | |
| | | | | |
| Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) | 3.0% | Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. | | | |
| | | | | |
| Total Weightage | 100% | | | | |
