Compare and Contrast Followership and Servant Leadership
Followership and servant leadership, one can compare the two styles easily to one another. The leadership forms contain several similarities (Griffing, 2019). Both models, ought to encompass reciprocal patience and respect. One must be versatile and selfless, and you should require self-awareness and those surrounding you. They have simpler differences, a follower, follows, and a servant leader remains a leader. The paper seeks to compare and contract servant and followership leadership.
A servant leader involves someone who shares power, builds subordinates, and prioritizes their needs. A servant leader serves first changing leadership hierarchy from the top down to the bottom. As a servant leader, you ought to listen always to those you lead (Griffing, 2019). Always listen since not everything the soldiers will say regarding a certain situation remains negative. Some of the information soldiers might share with you might be of a constructive nature. The information will provide you with an enhanced point of view on the mission set. Always maintaining self-awareness and for those surrounding you demonstrates a servant leader trait. In the military, no individual knows everything.
A servant leader remains aware of the things that you do not have any idea about them. Establish what you can always work on, and what your soldiers do not know. What the soldiers can work on assists to complete the efficiently and effectively (Griffing, 2019). For example, a soldier who knows how to start a vehicle, but another one does not know, as a servant leader will you send the soldier who does not know or you send the soldier who knows and the one who does not know so that the one who knows could show the other how to do it? The leadership style helps the leader to develop soldiers. A Servant leader must develops their soldiers assuming that those same soldiers will assume the same positions in the future. In reality, they will resume them eventually.
Despite a follower soldier remaining habituated to austerely following orders, at some point, they ought to make decisions on their own. Take action without having to follow every order. The main objective of being a follower is to ensure that one remains an active follower. A follower must have the ability to give feedback to the leader and provide a specific form of advice regarding suitable means the team might complete the mission (Wesson, 2017). If the leader is absent but left behind orders for the soldiers to follow before leaving, the follower must have the capability to comprehend requirements needed. Then take initiative to ensure the team accomplishes the orders. A follower must always remain independent and active thinker to help in formulating suitable means the team would utilize to complete the orders. Followers always seem to be ineffective, as well as their leaders. Followership leadership enables followers to ensure they look better, including their leaders as well. Since this is the only way the followers that provide completion of the set mission.
These two styles of leadership have both similarities and differences. As a leader, one must remain versatile, patient, and respectful. A follower must always have maximum respect for the individual in charge and no undermining them (Wesson, 2017). One should trust their judgment and belief that they would lead them to accomplish the mission and not lead them into an unfortunate situation as long as they assist in one. A servant leader, you ought to promote respect for the subordinates by choosing your words carefully when addressing them. Respect has always remained a two-way traffic affair. As a servant leader, you ought to respects them and they will respect you back. As a servant, and as a follower, one must regard everyone as human. One must exercise patience since it remains critical in leading the team. Versatility helps in obtaining options when plans change during the mission. A leader must have the capability and potential to formulate a new workable plan. As a follower, one must have the ability to follow the formulated plan immediately. In conclusion, the two styles of leadership contain more similarities and fewer differences within the army leadership. A servant leader in the army remains a leader, but he or she must assist in developing the subordinates to prepare them as future leaders who could resume their position. On the other hand, as a follower, he or she must act independently and aggressively in the event of an absence of orders.
References
Griffing, A. L. (2019). Servant Leadership: Ten Military Figures Who Got it Right, By XVIII Airborne Corps & Fort Bragg NCO Academy
Wesson, C. (2017). Army Leader, Servant Leader, Special to the NCO Journal.