Computer Science
Response 1
I agree that pacifism would be the correct approach to terrorism. Moreover, I concur that pacifism differs from terrorism in that, pacifism entails having friends on your side while terrorism involves having enemies against you. More importantly, pacifism entails the belief that any violence is justifiable under any circumstance and again, all disputes should be settled by a peaceful means. Conversely, I agree that at times, pacifism is not a suitable approach as it can fail between the victims and aggressors along with terrorism doing the same thing. Moreover, I agree that pacifism is the best approach to handle issues of terrorism as it involves proper agreements on resolutions. Also, I agree that terrorism significantly violates restrictions on justice and as a result, it may be quite challenging to solve issues that may arise. Lastly, I agree that war is never ethically correct since some wars were experienced in the past, and hence could be solved through peace.
Reference
Velasquez Manuel Philosophy: A Text with Readings, 13th Edition. Wadsworth 2017.
Response 2
I agree that it is not possible to live in a world without violence and more so, it is virtually impossible to prevent war from happening. I also concur that killing people is very wrong and if it takes a country to participate in a war to defend its citizens, then it would be appropriate. Moreover, I concur that for a war to be considered just it has to meet specific criteria. Lastly, I agree that the just war theorist came up with things that a country must meet while engaging in a just war. They include the resolution to wage a war that must be made by a ruler who is authorized to do so.
Response 3
I agree that terrorism entails the illegal use of force via violent conduct as well as intimidation of citizens, mainly, the civilian population to achieve political objectives. More importantly, I concur that terrorism has different meanings depending on who is defining it. I also agree that all governments are grounded on personal interests and as a result. More importantly, I agree that the two theories; The Natural Moral Laws by Locke and War of All against All by Hobbes are different but share similarities. Regarding that, the two theories share realistic ideas of perfect societies. Conversely, I concur that the only way a government can protect its citizens by looking into their interests. Lastly, on occasions where another country attacks its citizens, the government should wage a war against that particular country.
Response 4
Adaptation of a social contract for a government is indeed an effective way of interacting with people. Moreover, I agree that civilians may lose some rights as part of the tactic agreement in exchange for various benefits such as protection. More importantly, a government has a mandate to protect its citizens. Further, the government has a responsibility for resolving disputes. I agree that we will never be ethically right but under various circumstances, it is right for a government to resolve disputes. I also concur that pacifism uses the code on the utilitarian principle, and therefore, a government may require to use violence to deal with terrorism to protect its people.
Response 5
I agree with the view that Hobbes’s ideas that individuals tend to be selfish and hence, would not uphold moral rights without the influence of a government.Consequently, I agree that the idea does not give the government a chance to violate its citizens’ right, however, it should enforce moral laws thereby enabling both justice and fairness in the country.More importantly, I concur that people should not employ violence and war as a means to bring justice, as this would result in more harm than good. Conversely, I agree with the view that natural moral laws and that of John Lockes do not seem to be ethically right. Moreover, indulging in wars to solve disputes is not ethically correct and hence should be avoided. Lastly, I concur that a government should teach its citizens on morality and cultural values to help overcome the acts of terrorism.
Response 6
I agree that conditional pacifism views the concept of war as not right while absolute pacifism views war as right despite the circumstances. I concur that the main goal of conditional pacifism is to treat citizens with kindness and respect. More importantly, I agree with the just war theory that views war as evil since it results in morally wrong killings. Lastly, I agree with the fact that terrorism is morally incorrect and that the best means for nations to solve disputes is via the conditional pacifism method. The method aids in understanding each party and also helps in knowing the consequences of indulging in such acts.
Response 7
I agree that just war theory is a more moral concept when compared to others. Consequently, war is evil and most countries use it to defend themselves.I agree that war should never be used as it may bring with it some damages that may harm the whole country. Moreover, countries should use war as a last resort. Again, I agree with the view that war is horrible and that countries should not use it to solve disputes. Lastly, I concur with the view that war is inevitable and cannot be avoided.War brings suffering and the innocent citizens may not avoid it as war will have an impact on the entire country.