ETHICS
Codes comparison social work ethics Interprofessional ethics are an important part of the interdisciplinary teams we are often part of as social workers. To increase your understanding of interprofessional ethics, this is an analytical comparison of our NASW Code of Ethics (2017) and one other code of ethics from another profession/discipline/demographic (e.g. see examples below). Dual-track students will be required to compare the NAADAC and NASW Code of Ethics. Non-dual track students may select another code of ethics to compare. The length of your codes comparison paper (using APA format) will vary based on the codes you are comparing Rationale and relevance: Please briefly describe your current social work practice. Outline your rationale for selecting the code you have selected to compare and analyze (per below). Specifically state this code is central to your practice. c) Similarities and differences: Select and briefly explain 3 specific ethical standards (that follows from a core value or principle) that each code essentially shares (perhaps not in the same words, but generally similar in intent). Discuss how these standards exemplify the (i) similarities and (ii) differences among ethical standards in social work and the variations within the profession. d) Statutes: How do the provisions of the Minnesota Board of Practice Act appear to apply to the principles covered by the other student’s analysis (Note: If the MN BOSW Practice Act 148E is silent on the principles covered, say so). Dual-track students (MSW/LADC), please be sure to integrate either the Minnesota statute (2019) 245G (Chemical dependency licensed treatment facilities) or federal confidentiality regulations 42 CFR Part 2, as relevant. e) Assignment submission: Post part a (only) on the online Moodle forum; submit parts ae above using the drop box on Moodle. Note: The length of your codes comparison paper will depend on the interprofessional codes selected. and I have the codes table already
Codes comparison social work ethics Interprofessional ethics are an important part of the interdisciplinary teams we are often part of as social workers. To increase your understanding of interprofessional ethics, this is an analytical comparison of our NASW Code of Ethics (2017) and one other code of ethics from another profession/discipline/demographic (e.g. see examples below). Dual-track students will be required to compare the NAADAC and NASW Code of Ethics. Non-dual track students may select another code of ethics to compare. The length of your codes comparison paper (using APA format) will vary based on the codes you are comparing Rationale and relevance: Please briefly describe your current social work practice. Outline your rationale for selecting the code you have selected to compare and analyze (per below). Specifically state this code is central to your practice. c) Similarities and differences: Select and briefly explain 3 specific ethical standards (that follows from a core value or principle) that each code essentially shares (perhaps not in the same words, but generally similar in intent). Discuss how these standards exemplify the (i) similarities and (ii) differences among ethical standards in social work and the variations within the profession. d) Statutes: How do the provisions of the Minnesota Board of Practice Act appear to apply to the principles covered by the other student’s analysis (Note: If the MN BOSW Practice Act 148E is silent on the principles covered, say so). Dual-track students (MSW/LADC), please be sure to integrate either the Minnesota statute (2019) 245G (Chemical dependency licensed treatment facilities) or federal confidentiality regulations 42 CFR Part 2, as relevant. e) Assignment submission: Post part a (only) on the online Moodle forum; submit parts ae above using the drop box on Moodle. Note: The length of your codes comparison paper will depend on the interprofessional codes selected. and I have the codes table already