Existentialist theory on the theme of man freedom
When it comes to being and nothingness, Sartre goes ahead to tries to finesse his existentialist theory precisely so on the theme of man freedom by outlining that death is not something that one expects for the community. Therefore it deserves some individual cases of an exception amongst which one can be sentenced to death because of his speech, “Furthermore, death cannot be awaited unless it is very precisely designated as my condemnation to death” (Sartre 65).beside this type of Sartre perspective sums up the sort of dilemma that Pablo was going through for example he had been living an unfinished life as a result of his life depending on an umpteen of future choices. Yet, at that specific time in the middle it is full of flux in the sense that it could have been terminated sooner during the day of his execution. Whichever the way based on him and in line to the theme of freedom of a man as illustrated by Sartre existentialist theory it ethical than anything that seems to have no end ill have to end at some point in life no matter how long it will take (Abelson and Kai 398).
Besides, I have the feeling that trying to reconcile the first-person narrative with Sartre plot in which a character outlines I am condemned or sentenced to death is one of the significant challenges besets of the wall. Fro the wall there is indelible evidence to the contrary that this is not a minor challenge but a fundamental dilemma towards the growth of the story prose this dilemma seems to recapitulate in a highly condensed way bring about vital difficulties which necessarily trouble any efforts to incarnate existentialist theory in Sartre narrative form. In this regard, there is no douth about Pablo’s execution examining this story, which is done from a first-person perspective. In this regard, we can never run short of means that support and finesse this statement. For example, the story could end before Pablo’s execution. Still, in the wall, this solution cannot serve Sartre’s agenda since such an undertaking would mean that Pablo’s ultimate fate would remain undecided. Besides, I have the understanding that Sartre’s story the wall gives an incredible work of fiction from which we can only have the justification of Sartre’s short story trick ending as far as existentialist theory is in mind.
Inconclusion, from Sartre’s understanding of what s meant to be human according to his existentialist point of view, it can be summarized up in his reasoning that the underlying motivational action should be found like consciousness desire for being. According to the author, it is up to every person to exercise their freedom in a manner that they do not lose sight of their existence as fantasy and as a free human being in the community. According to Sartre, by doing so, people will have abetter understanding of the original choices which their whole life represents and as a result value of their lives. Consequently, in Sartre’s view, this kind of authentic option for life feasibly represents the actual realization of human life’s universal singularity.