Feedback in Writing.
The provision and reception of feedback form an integral part of writing. Budding writers use the feedback as a mirror of the creative abilities, strengths, and weaknesses they hold. Therefore, feedback providers need to be cautious and understand the state of the writer as they criticize a piece of work. The most essential element of the critics is to find something positive in a piece of writing. When the positive elements are coupled up with specific comments on the nitty-gritty details of a piece, the writer can grasp the responses that can assist in the growth and finding inspiration during the creative process.
Nevertheless, conferences between the coaching teacher and student writer come out as the most effective form of feedback. In this context, the teacher assumes the role of the target readers (Keh 298). Therefore, the teachers unpack the piece of writing and seek clarification whenever necessary. This interaction enables the student writer to go through the process with a coach, thus, the writer can engage the teacher in decision-making processes. Moreover, the conference invites other learners in the writer’s space. Their presence hands the writer more feedback since they also understand the needs of the audience concerning reading. The back and forth interaction among the teacher, other students, and the writer makes the writing process enjoyable and effective.
Development in the creative process requires concerted efforts from different groups of people. Therefore, conferences serve right since it brings different literary enthusiasts together. Coming together enables collecting different ideas from the teacher and other students. Further, the students can provide immediate feedback concerning the relevance and comprehension abilities of a piece of creative writing. Also, they can give their thoughts on the logic of a storyline. The feedbacks can assist me in restructuring my method of writing and finding inspiration to write.
Work Cited
Keh, Claudia L. “Feedback in the writing process: A model and methods for implementation.” 1990, pp. 294-304. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.453.2387&rep=rep1&type=pdf