Peer Review
Name of student
Institution
General Review Guidelines
Literature Review
keeping the guidelines in mind, the study has not addressed how the findings are related to this study. The authors of the study need to rewrite the introduction, discussion, conclusion, and reference concerning literature. In the introduction paragraph, the author has combined the study and the discussion and concluded. The reader cannot completely understand the study. Therefore, I would advise the authors to make a clear introduction of the context so that the reader will be able to know what the paper is all about. Also, I would advise the authors to clarify the sections to prevent confusing the reader. Further, in the discussion paragraph, the authors have made the literature complex by combining and discussing multiple findings and also putting their ideas. Therefore, I would advise the authors to have every discussion on a separate paragraph. Also, they should not combine their ideas with the findings of the study. Additionally, the language of the study used by the authors is not clear hence difficult to follow. Therefore, I would advise the authors to improve the readability and flow of the whole text. Also, the start off of the study is not good, therefore, the authors should add more information that explains their choice of approaches.
Week 5 Discussion
In this research article, the authors do not keep the guidelines of the literature review. On the first page, the authors have started with the reference page. I would advise the authors that while using the APA format, the first page should only include the topic, name of the student, and the name of the institution. By the literature review guidelines, the authors should keep in mind that the reference page should not come first rather should appear at the end of the paper. Also in this paper, the authors have not included a satisfactory summary to show the source of the content. Therefore, I should advise the authors to Keep in mind the guidelines of the literature review that the annotated bibliography should have information to convince the reader on the relevancy of the sources cited. I would advise the authors to include a summary of the critical evaluations of the source and the main focus of the work whose length should be about 4-6 sentences. The second page of the paper does not have an abstract. Therefore, I would advise the authors to start with the abstract as an overview of the whole content. In general, the formatting of the paper does not follow the general guidelines of the literature review. Additionally, the authors have not given an introduction heading hence his work is not readable and does not have a flow. I would, therefore, advise the authors to improve on the context flow and the readability of the context.
Literature Review Tips
The introduction of the article should have a clear purpose for the study. For an organized literature review, the authors should use level headings for the topic. Additionally, while putting the citations, the authors should learn and be sure when to use et al. The conclusion paragraph, should be a summary of the discussed context. Therefore, the conclusion ought to be brief and at the point and should have both clarity and brevity characteristics. Probably, it should be one paragraph repetition of the literature review. The reference list should come after the paper and should include entries for every discussed publication in the literature review. The annotated bibliography should include three parts; critical annotations, summary annotations, and the blending of the two. Every citation should be followed by a short evaluative, descriptive paragraph known as the annotation whose purpose is to notify the person reading of the article on the accuracy, quality, and relevance of the cited sources. Additionally, the sections of the paper should follow each other according to the literature review guidelines. For instance, the introduction, discussion, conclusion, and the reference page should follow each other in that order. The whole context of the findings of the paper should be able to support the conclusion of the study.