Topic: Governance and Sustainability
Introduction
Corporate governance is the gathering of mechanisms, processes, and relationships through corporations that are operated and controlled (Yermack, 2017). Corporate sustainability is, on the other hand, the procedure focusing on making long-term stakeholders value through the implementation of the strategy for the business that aims on ethical, the surrounding, social, and the commercial dimensions of undertaking a business (Samra, 2016). Corporate sustainability is achieved by having interactions with the environment of the company, and within the community it operates to increase performance and profits. Sustainable corporations are the most innovative as they keep reviewing the processes existing to get much greener options (Ioannou, 2017). Sustainability also helps construct good reputation with the clients. Corporate governance has the laid down principles, procedures, and policies, and vividly defined accountability and responsibilities applied by the stakeholders to respond to issues of interest relation in the corporate (Khan et al., 2017). It is also essential as it promotes transparency which facilitates strong and balanced development of the economic system. For this paper I will the importance of the sustainability of corporate, the roles of the stakeholders in corporate sustainability, and finally evaluate the importance of stakeholder-partnerships in the sustainability of the corporate.
Importance of the sustainability of the corporate
Every sector regardless if it is sole, organizations, and governments are now prioritizing on sustainability as a pertinent factor in their policies. The community is now being aware of its influence in the surroundings, their collective contribution towards a sustainable future resulting to significant changes in the landscape of the corporate. Sustainable innovations are the fundamental factor in the current business models to pave a way for other companies or entities to engage (Grewatsch, 2018). The corporate sustainability evolves within three pillars; these are the economic, the social, and the environmental pillar. Every pillar is crucial as a part of the corporate sustainability. I will discuss the individual pillars and their importance as segments of the sustainability in the corporation.
Environment pillar
The environment pillar is the most pertinent of all. Corporations which are sustainable are usually the most innovative as they review their processes constantly to identify better and most productive alternatives (Witjes et al., 2017). By mitigating their footprint carbon, and the waste packaging, corporations are capable to witness impacts which are positive in their public reputation, and the returns for the finances. Some common goals in the environment of the corporate that assist the entity to save money, and decrease their effects on the environment are implementing management of the transportation systems, decrease the emissions of the carbon gases, and packaging improving (Vermeulen, 2017). As the awareness within the issues of the environment rises, it is crucial to have a vision of green sustainability to create a reputation with the clients of the corporate. Environmental quality- aims at health societies by promoting a health air, and non-toxic environment and natural resources used by the corporation. The environment should uphold the mission of the corporation.
The social pillar
This pillar focuses on having the assistance of stakeholders, the employees, and the society. Treating your workers fairly, and achieving a respectful process of chain of supply results to productivity rise, and creativity in the corporate (Chemineau, 2016). It still results to increased engagement, and retention. Generally, using sustainable social strategies in the long run leads in a workforce with significant skills and knowledge, and even more motivations (Abu-Alruz et al., 2018). This is a very crucial aspect in the corporate as it will enhance the morale in the workforce and lead to further productions in the corporate. Again ensuring a sustainable society oriented culture motivates the employees to be more innovative- who are with the capability to improve on already existing commodities, processes, and the models of the business (Panatsa et al., 2018). In global dimensions the social pillar means being aware of how and where your chain of supply is being best, in terms of better wages, labor sustainability, and respectful to the society.
Corporate sustainability focuses on improving concern of the investors who look not only commercial profit but also the social good (Kalender, 2016). It addresses the societies influence occurring as a result of their activities like health, water scarcity and goodness of the society within their corporates, management of land that respects the local people’s rights.
The economic pillar
As opposed to the meaning of its name, the economic pillar is in fact it has nothing to do with the profit at any cost for the entity. It is about the management of the corporate risks (Gaviglio et al., 2016). The goodness lies in the balance between ethics, and profit for the corporate. Though any alteration in the chain of supply can result to short term financial benefits, it should be evaluated with adverse skepticism if there is potential risk of damage to the reputation of the corporate. An economic pillar still offers a counterweight to adverse sustainability guidelines that corporates are usually required to implement, like the completely leaving fossil fuels (Purvis et al., 2019). Corporate procedures must not be self-defeating nor harmful to long term reputation, and growth for the corporate. The economic pillar crucially makes it easy for the corporates to progress achieving sustainability changes at systematic, and financially rate constant. Sustainability upholds the mission of the corporate by improving the health, and quality of life the society.
Economic pillar is also very crucial in corporation’s sustainability as it promotes jobs and the growth of the corporate (Venkataraman, 2019). It focuses on handling issues to do with changes in the climate, the pollutions and other environmental issues that can be dangerous and impact other people’s lives, health, and livelihoods. Sustainability includes the health of the air, the health of the land, and of the sea.
The roles of stakeholders in the sustainability of the corporates
Stakeholders are the customers, the workers, and the society with a top interest on the strategies for the company, and the plans for the development. All of these elements are impacted by the sustainability efforts of the corporate, and those efforts impact the whole society, and the international environment (Baumgartner, 2017). Stakeholders have the rights for the legal decision making, and they may manage the project scheduling, and issues of the budget. Most corporate stakeholders have the rights to the corporations that include providing developer’s education, project financing, formulating parameters for the scheduling and also setting the datelines for the projects of the corporate (Goodman et al., 2017). Oversight role where the stakeholders are supposed to review deliverable items of the project, with the assistance of the engineers, architects, and maybe contractors, corporate stakeholders are responsible for approving the deliverable items of the project.
Stakeholders in the corporate have various duties relating to the particular projects or operations they fund (Tanggamani et al., 2017). For instance in a corporate, a corporate stakeholder may fund an operation and become responsible for the final output of such a project or operation. The corporate stakeholders are also responsible for the efficiency of the corporate and that may be done through ensuring quality training to the workers, overseeing segmental flow of work, handling the corporates finances and ensuring minimum wastes (Bradford et al., 2017). Stakeholders for the big corporates have the role of job sub-division. This occurs when the operation or the project to be overseen is much bigger that stakeholders may be unable to oversee efficiently and conveniently. With such a fact the corporate managers will chose and assign other stakeholders to help them meet their goal of overseeing the progress and quality of the operations, these sub overseers are then required to provide reports on the progress of small projects respectively.
Management role of the stakeholders- stakeholders can hold crucial management ranks where they can report directly to the managers or the boss of the corporate (Korsunova etal., 2016). They also make the voting during the decision making whereby the stakeholders with the highest votes go ahead to making and formulating the decisions for the corporate. Providing time and estimates of the cost-it is the responsible of the stakeholders to ensure accurate and logic estimates of the operations are done. This helps schedules for the smooth operations, and flow of the activities. Providing time ensures the operation of the corporate do not consume much time of the corporate doing irrelevant assignments, with time provided, employees get the schedule and work precisely towards the intended goal of the corporate. This also ensures that deadlines are closely observed and adhered to (De Villiers et al., 2016).
It is also the role of the corporate stakeholders to participate in the process of risk management, this is achieved by using the managers with the necessary skills and experiences to identify the potential risks of the project, this is crucial as the risk will be identified and the necessary measures taken to turn it into an achievement for the corporate or rather finding alternative means to evade the risk (Maas et al., 2016). The stakeholders of the corporate have the responsible to enforce ground rules, stakeholders are involved in setting the rules for the corporate, and also enforcing such laws within the organization by creating awareness among the employees and any other participant in the corporate. The stakeholders have the role to identify the challenges and assumptions in the corporate (Andriof, 2017). For instance, the project managers or operational managers are equipped with the best skills to help them identify any challenge in the implementation process, they are capable of even foreseeing possible potentials for the constraints, and take the critical measures to respond to such constraints, this might involve acquiring the personnel that can modify the constraint into a benefit for the company. And finally stakeholders are responsible for decomposing packages of work in which they are accountable into the scheduled activities.
Importance of stakeholder-partnerships in corporate sustainability
Multi-stakeholder partnerships for the development sustainability are often used as a crucial current element of the emerging model of international sustainability. They have been upheld most in the United States nations (Dentoni et al., 2018). It is a very noble idea for the multi-stakeholders for the essence of sustainable development and growth of the corporates. They are basically aimed at achieving the goals of the corporate. The multi-shareholder mergers are pertinent in some different ways as discussed below.
Firstly they help bring or combine the resources together; this results to a kind of synergy value which the additional value is created when two corporates join their financial resources together. This value is very crucial as it is used in financing operations which were difficult to be financed by an individual stakeholder or corporate. Combining resource enhances the achievement of the corporates goals. Secondly manpower from the two partnering shareholders is very essential as the manpower from one Corporate may be very poor and the other very qualified (MacDonald et al., 2018). This helps the companies to join the best human resource which can help achieve the intended purpose of the organization. Stakeholders partnering also bring together, and level the abilities from various sources, for example, the corporate can expose the gaps of funding in the government or private sustainability projects through investing their resources.
Thirdly, multi-shareholder partnerships is essential in meeting the missed targets, for instance, a corporate may have failed to attain one or two of its goals and objectives during the implementation of its operations, joining shareholders will enhance unveil the possible reasons why the goals were not achieved (Dahiya, 2018). With this, the joining of the shareholders will provide the potentiality to focus on such failures and impose the necessary guidelines and the procedures to recover the failure and turn it into an achievement. Fourthly, it is very critical to have multi-stakeholder partnerships as they will be able to combine and unveil some crucial issues and constraints within the operations of the process (Clarke, 2019). Having identified such constraints, and challenges they will now maximize their efforts and work towards overcoming those weaknesses. And finally the financial aid where corporates stakeholders partner to help one another financially. This will help the corporate with inadequate finances to grow, and develop at a sustainable stable rate. This is very important as it saves one or both corporates to join efforts and form one strong stakeholder agreement that will be able to reach the intended goals in the long run (Oburu, 2018).
Conclusion
in conclusion, the paper has focused on the corporate sustainability which is on the other hand the procedure focusing to make long-term stakeholders value through the implementation of the strategy for the business that aims on ethical, the surrounding, social, and the commercial dimensions of undertaking a business. It has also looked at the importance of the sustainability of the corporate whereby there are three pillars which try to explain the importance of corporate sustainability. The three pillars are the social pillar which entails the lives and the engagements of the people within the corporate and the surrounding, the economic pillar which deals with the relationship between profit and ethics, and the environment which deals with the surrounding of the society.
The have also discussed the roles of stakeholders in the sustainability of the corporates which include the issue of identifying the possible challenges and constraints, voting to influence the decision making process in the corporate, controlling and managing the operations of the corporate, and making the schedules for the activities, they also participate in risk management process, decomposing the workforce as they are involved in scheduling the activities, and their deadlines. And finally, the importance of stakeholder partnerships which include pooling of the resources, financial aiding, combining the best work force, and achievement of the missed targets.
References
Yermack, D., 2017. Corporate governance and blockchains. Review of Finance, 21(1), pp.7-31.
Samra, E., 2016. Corporate governance in Islamic financial institutions.
Ioannou, I. and Serafeim, G., 2017. The consequences of mandatory corporate sustainability reporting. Harvard Business School research working paper, (11-100).
Khan, M., Serafeim, G. and Yoon, A., 2016. Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The accounting review, 91(6), pp.1697-1724.
Grewatsch, S. and Kleindienst, I., 2018. How organizational cognitive frames affect organizational capabilities: The context of corporate sustainability. Long Range Planning, 51(4), pp.607-624.
Witjes, S., Vermeulen, W.J. and Cramer, J.M., 2017. Exploring corporate sustainability integration into business activities. Experiences from 18 small and medium sized enterprises in the Netherlands. Journal of Cleaner Production, 153, pp.528-538.
Vermeulen, W.J. and Cramer, J.M., 2017. Assessing Corporate Sustainability integration for corporate self-reflection. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 127, pp.132-147.
Chemineau, P., 2016. Invited review: Importance of animal health and welfare for the stability of the three pillars of sustainability of livestock systems 1. Advances in Animal Biosciences, 7(2), pp.208-214.
Abu-Alruz, J., Hailat, S., Al-Jaradat, M. and Khasawneh, S., 2018. Attitudes toward Pillars of Sustainable Development: The Case for University Science Education Students in Jordan. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 20(2), pp.64-73.
Panatsa, V.M. and Malandrakis, G., 2018. Student teachers’ perceptions about the social pillar of urban sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education.
Kalender, Z.T. and Vayvay, Ö., 2016. The fifth pillar of the balanced scorecard: sustainability. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 235, pp.76-83.
Gaviglio, A., Bertocchi, M., Marescotti, M.E., Demartini, E. and Pirani, A., 2016. The social pillar of sustainability: a quantitative approach at the farm level. Agricultural and Food Economics, 4(1), p.15.
Purvis, B., Mao, Y. and Robinson, D., 2019. Three pillars of sustainability: in search of conceptual origins.
Venkataraman, S., 2019. Stakeholder Approach To Corporate Sustainability: A Review (No. 319).
Baumgartner, R.J. and Rauter, R., 2017. Strategic perspectives of corporate sustainability management to develop a sustainable organization. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, pp.81-92.
Goodman, J., Korsunova, A. and Halme, M., 2017. Our collaborative future: Activities and roles of stakeholders in sustainability‐oriented innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(6), pp.731-753.
Tanggamani, V., Bakar, S.A.N.A. and Othman, R.D., 2017. Incorporating Role of Stakeholders into Corporate CSR Strategy For Sustainable Growth: An Exploratory Study. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 36, p. 00040). EDP Sciences.
Bradford, M., Earp, J.B., Showalter, D.S. and Williams, P.F., 2017. Corporate sustainability reporting and stakeholder concerns: Is there a disconnect?. Accounting Horizons, 31(1), pp.83-102.
Korsunova, A., Goodman, J.C. and Halme, M., 2016. Activities and Roles of Stakeholders in Sustainability-Oriented Innovation of Firms. In Academy of Management Proceedings (Vol. 2016, No. 1, p. 15594). Briarcliff Manor, NY 10510: Academy of Management.
De Villiers, C., Rouse, P. and Kerr, J., 2016. A new conceptual model of influences driving sustainability based on case evidence of the integration of corporate sustainability management control and reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, pp.78-85.
Maas, K., Schaltegger, S. and Crutzen, N., 2016. Integrating corporate sustainability assessment, management accounting, control, and reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 136, pp.237-248.
Andriof, J. and Waddock, S., 2017. Unfolding stakeholder engagement. In Unfolding stakeholder thinking (pp. 19-42). Routledge.
Dentoni, D., Bitzer, V. and Schouten, G., 2018. Harnessing wicked problems in multi-stakeholder partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(2), pp.333-356.
MacDonald, A., Clarke, A., Huang, L., Roseland, M. and Seitanidi, M.M., 2018. Multi-stakeholder partnerships (SDG# 17) as a means of achieving sustainable communities and cities (SDG# 11). In Handbook of sustainability science and research (pp. 193-209). Springer, Cham.
Dahiya, B. and Okitasari, M., 2018. Partnering for Sustainable Development Guidelines for Multi-stakeholder Partnerships to Implement the 2030 Agenda in Asia and the Pacific.
Clarke, A. and Huang, L., 2019. Multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainability: designing decision-making processes for partnership capacity. Journal of Business Ethics, 160(2), pp.409-426.
Oburu, P.O. and Yoshikawa, H., 2018. Roles of Multiple Stakeholder Partnerships in Addressing Developmental and Implementation Challenges of Sustainable Development Goals. In Developmental Science and Sustainable Development Goals for Children and Youth (pp. 421-438). Springer, Cham.