Herbert’s theory of the struggle for existence justifies the Darwinism concept in a way that agrees with social division and exploitation. Spencer formalized the analogy that the robust species passing the characteristics to their descendants support the longevity of the theory negatively. The case meant that when a superior being depicted specific features, then automatically its descendants will adopt the same behavioral pattern evolutionarily. Herbert’s theory argues that one cannot ascertain change without adapting to the environment in conjunction with its source of origin. The approach brings out a biased social Darwinism, whereby the concept of survival for the fittest is rather brutal, gruesome, and inhumane.
In addition to that, Darwin portrayed how implementing change comes from an evolutionary context. Growth is established in an outwards manner and proportion, in regards to the internal elements that build the characteristics conveyed from the outside. Such concepts objectify the implementation of the inferiority complex, as the evolutionary theory of species becomes in harmony with natural selection. The case means that species are in synch with the environment, and to evolve, one must adopt the surroundings first, a sense of self-awareness. Only human beings have the power to imagine, unlike animals who develop under conditioning. The case of eugenics uses the same concept in that it aims at improving the human race through ridding the society of its undesirables. For example, Galton’s theory of eugenics proposes that mental asylums and social institutions allow inferior humans to reproduce and evolve on a higher level than the renowned superior humans in society. Eradicating the theory means withdrawing from depending on the imaginative power of humankind to develop through natural selection in a community.