Internal oppression
Internal oppression is a typical encounter between different gatherings of individuals: women, racial/ethnic encounters, youth, the elderly, and people with disabilities. Internalized violence has been associated with a decline in personal and general self-esteem, misery, feelings of grief, fragility and isolation. [1]This observation has changed considerably in Syrian culture, although men consider themselves advocates of the family. Women still face the family; Their remaining responsibilities have been expanded, and the extraordinary burden on men has considerably diminished as Syrians find it difficult to find work in host countries due to legitimate restrictions. In this way, they experience fatigue, weakness and low self-esteem. Lower self-esteem can lead displaced people to express their masculinity negatively. For example, these feelings are responsible for being violent with family members. This has contributed to the spread of sexual barbarism among Syrians.[2] Syrian evacuees announced that they were physically energetic towards life partners and adolescents.
Another test was held at the Zaatari refugee camp in Jordan. It was based on a professional program with women in exile.[3] The results showed that women’s safety, confidence and ability improved. The program helped women pay for a higher standard of living and gave them confidence after suffering gunshot wounds.
In addition to institutional change, a character must also be important for change in the intermediate and intrapersonal domain. Social elements (e.g., a very delicate determination and the maintenance of social collaborations and ties) are personally associated with character contrasts and contribute to a very constructive and satisfying character.[4] As a result, it has been shown that the angles of the character, in particular, the unique contrasts of the company (warmth, perseverance, tendency to work together) and the organization (trust, willingness to play) are linked, for example, with social outcomes. business quality and quantity[5] and intrapsychic changes, including trust, emotional well-being and prosperity.[6] Although the character’s work, unlike intrapersonal changes and displaced persons, has not yet been studied, there is indirect evidence of such effects in the area of transference research. Common factors, such as acceptance affect the cultural assimilation of sociodemographic factors.[7] The combination was also based on proactive qualities and, for example, kindness, level of movement and sensation seeking.[8]
The Social cognitive theory, on the other hand, provides a valid system for understanding mental adjustment in adults who have suffered terrible incidences in life.[9] Only the idea of coping self-efficacy (CSE) is anchored in this hypothetical structure, which alludes to one’s apparent ability to adapt to the difficulties of everyday life successfully.[10] In a context of terrible pressure, the idea of CSE-related injury is linked to the recognition of a person who can manage the onset of potentially terrible accidents, including how to handle the event such as post-traumatic challenges and manifestations of misery and the ability to live their typical life.[11] The hypothesis concerns CSE in relation to accidents in the context of mental adjustment, the explicit limit of self-governance and objective coordination.[12] Injury-related CSE has been shown to have a lower rate of PTSD manifestations immediately after severe stress[13] and up to ten years after the disruption.[14] Currently, no study has examined the relationship between CSE and PTSD injuries among displaced Syrians in Germany.
Valentine, on the other hand, notes that the acculturation of refugees in host countries has a significant impact, especially when it comes to self-esteem among refugees.[15] Acculturation in this context can be likened to assimilation, and in most instances, refugees have to abandon their culture to cope with the new society. In most scenarios, the refugees tend to find difficulties assimilating into the new culture, and in such instances, this can impact on their self-esteem.[16] Findings from the research show that immigrants with higher self-esteem tend to be more sociable, and this offers them the ability to integrate into their surroundings.[17]
Bibliography
Wong, Gloria, Annie O. Derthick, E. J. R. David, Anne Saw, and Sumie Okazaki. “The what, the why, and the how: A review of racial microaggressions research in psychology.” Race and social problems 6, no. 2 (2014): 181-200.
Charles, Lorraine, and Kate Denman. “Syrian and Palestinian Syrian refugees in Lebanon: the plight of women and children.” Journal of International Women’s Studies 14, no. 5 (2013): 96-111.
Jabbar, Sinaria Abdel, and Haidar Ibrahim Zaza. “Evaluating a vocational training programme for women refugees at the Zaatari camp in Jordan: Women empowerment: A journey and not an output.” International Journal of Adolescence and Youth 21, no. 3 (2016): 304-319.
Back, Mitja D., Anna Baumert, Jaap JA Denissen, Freda‐Marie Hartung, Lars Penke, Stefan C. Schmukle, Felix D. Schönbrodt et al. “PERSOC: A unified framework for understanding the dynamic interplay of personality and social relationships.” European Journal of Personality 25, no. 2 (2011): 90-107.
Back, Mitja D., and Simine Vazire. “The social consequences of personality: Six suggestions for future research.” European Journal of Personality 29, no. 2 (2015): 296-307.
Roberts, Brent W., Nathan R. Kuncel, Rebecca Shiner, Avshalom Caspi, and Lewis R. Goldberg. “The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes.” Perspectives on Psychological science 2, no. 4 (2007): 313-345.
Smither, Robert, and Marta Rodriguez‐Giegling. “Personality, demographics, and acculturation of Vietnamese and Nicaraguan refugees to the United States.” International Journal of Psychology 17, no. 1-4 (1982): 19-25.
Schmitz, Paul G., and John W. Berry. “Structure of acculturation attitudes and their relationships with personality and psychological adaptation: A study with immigrant and national samples in Germany.” (2011).
Benight, Charles C., and Michelle L. Harper. “Coping self‐efficacy perceptions as a mediator between acute stress response and long‐term distress following natural disasters.” Journal of Traumatic Stress: Official Publication of The International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies 15, no. 3 (2002): 177-186.
Benight, Charles C., and Albert Bandura. “Social cognitive theory of post-traumatic recovery: The role of perceived self-efficacy.” Behaviour research and therapy 42, no. 10 (2004): 1129-1148.
Bosmans, Mark WG, and Peter G. Van der Velden. “Longitudinal interplay between post-traumatic stress symptoms and coping self-efficacy: A four-wave prospective study.” Social Science & Medicine 134 (2015): 23-29.
Bosmans, Mark WG, Charles C. Benight, Leontien M. van der Knaap, Frans Willem Winkel, and Peter G. van der Velden. “The associations between coping self‐efficacy and post-traumatic stress symptoms 10 years postdisaster: Differences between men and women.” Journal of Traumatic Stress 26, no. 2 (2013): 184-191.
[1] Wong, Gloria, Annie O. Derthick, E. J. R. David, Anne Saw, and Sumie Okazaki. “The what, the why, and the how: A review of racial microaggressions research in psychology.” Race and social problems 6, no. 2 (2014): 181-200.
[2] Charles, Lorraine, and Kate Denman. “Syrian and Palestinian Syrian refugees in Lebanon: the plight of women and children.” Journal of International Women’s Studies 14, no. 5 (2013): 96-111.
[3] Jabbar, Sinaria Abdel, and Haidar Ibrahim Zaza. “Evaluating a vocational training programme for women refugees at the Zaatari camp in Jordan: Women empowerment: A journey and not an output.” International Journal of Adolescence and Youth 21, no. 3 (2016): 304-319.
[4] Back, Mitja D., Anna Baumert, Jaap JA Denissen, Freda‐Marie Hartung, Lars Penke, Stefan C. Schmukle, Felix D. Schönbrodt et al. “PERSOC: A unified framework for understanding the dynamic interplay of personality and social relationships.” European Journal of Personality 25, no. 2 (2011): 90-107.
[5] Back, Mitja D., and Simine Vazire. “The social consequences of personality: Six suggestions for future research.” European Journal of Personality 29, no. 2 (2015): 296-307.
[6] Roberts, Brent W., Nathan R. Kuncel, Rebecca Shiner, Avshalom Caspi, and Lewis R. Goldberg. “The power of personality: The comparative validity of personality traits, socioeconomic status, and cognitive ability for predicting important life outcomes.” Perspectives on Psychological science 2, no. 4 (2007): 313-345.
[7] Smither, Robert, and Marta Rodriguez‐Giegling. “Personality, demographics, and acculturation of Vietnamese and Nicaraguan refugees to the United States.” International Journal of Psychology 17, no. 1-4 (1982): 19-25.
[8] Schmitz, Paul G., and John W. Berry. “Structure of acculturation attitudes and their relationships with personality and psychological adaptation: A study with immigrant and national samples in Germany.” (2011).
[9] Benight, Charles C., and Michelle L. Harper. “Coping self‐efficacy perceptions as a mediator between acute stress response and long‐term distress following natural disasters.” Journal of Traumatic Stress: Official Publication of The International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies 15, no. 3 (2002): 177-186.
[10] Benight, Charles C., and Albert Bandura. “Social cognitive theory of post-traumatic recovery: The role of perceived self-efficacy.” Behaviour research and therapy 42, no. 10 (2004): 1129-1148.
[11] Bosmans, Mark WG, and Peter G. Van der Velden. “Longitudinal interplay between post-traumatic stress symptoms and coping self-efficacy: A four-wave prospective study.” Social Science & Medicine 134 (2015): 23-29.
[12] Benight and Bandura. “Social cognitive theory of post-traumatic recovery: The role of perceived self-efficacy.”
[13] Benight and Harper. “Coping self‐efficacy perceptions as a mediator between acute stress response and long‐term distress following natural disasters.”
[14] Bosmans, Mark WG, Charles C. Benight, Leontien M. van der Knaap, Frans Willem Winkel, and Peter G. van der Velden. “The associations between coping self‐efficacy and post-traumatic stress symptoms 10 years postdisaster: Differences between men and women.” Journal of Traumatic Stress 26, no. 2 (2013): 184-191.
[15] Valentine, Sean. “Self-esteem, cultural identity, and generation status as determinants of Hispanic acculturation.” Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences 23, no. 4 (2001): 459-468.
[16] Valentine. “Self-esteem, cultural identity, and generation status as determinants of Hispanic acculturation.”
[17] Valentine. “Self-esteem, cultural identity, and generation status as determinants of Hispanic acculturation.”