Judicial Context and Christianity Essay
The judicial system has been under renovation since its initiation. The fight between religion and pluralistic moral values has remained a controversial topic in judgments made in the judiciary. Many of the judges with a history of religious beliefs are deemed unfit to make the judgment of a public capacity due to their religious beliefs. However, secular values are upheld and used in decision making without question. Do religious morals hurt, or are they too moral to be acceptable in contemporary society (Griffen, 1998).
A Christian point of view is based on their belief system as governed by biblical principles. Their judgment is rational and more holistic, considering the welfare of every person. There is a restriction within Christianity, but individual orientation judgments and ideologies propel a secular world. For instance, gay marriage is upheld in secularism. However, Christianity disapproves of the union of people of the same sex (Altschuler et al., 2016). Therefore, a Christian judge will rule against gays in a case concerning gay marriage. Christianity is self-governed as there are set regulations.
Policies are made and designed to serve the interest of the few. Policies are created from a material point of view in which many of the systems do not align with Christian beliefs. Policies are written or verbal using unambiguous, simple and easy language to understand and meant to control and govern people on what to do (Chambers, 1993). Christianity is a lifestyle that is influenced by ethics and values which are held from within a person. Policies are final and not flexible being followed to the letter. The religious belief system considers the importance of humanity and the values of nature which align to biblical principles. Christian views are the opposite of the secular world view which is employed in the development of policies.
The moral fabric of the judicial system can best be aligned to serve humans better if it were to cooperate with religious values. By listening and debating the religious values alongside other moral knowledge sources will improve the chances of making wise and just decisions. The judicial system should desist from relying on one part of the sphere of moral perception but allow religious and other ethical sources to influence decision making equally (Chambers, 1993). Through these adoptions, the increased ability of the judiciary to be reliable and just at whatever circumstance is expected. Otherwise, we are considering religious values as unworthy of presenting justice (Griffen, 1998).
References
Altschuler, B. E., Sgroi, C. A., & Ryniker, M. R. (2016). Understanding Law in a changing society. Routledge.
Chambers, D. E. (1993). Social policy and social programs: A method for the practical public policy analyst. Macmillan College.
Griffen, W. L. (1998). The Case For Religious Values In Judicial Decision-Making. Marquette Law Review, 81(2), 513.