Medical complication
The case presented in the Villa Health media scenario indicates the activities of health professionals who collaborate from various care settings to plan and provide care to a two-year-old patient, Caitlynn. The child has been diagnosed and is being admitted for the second time in the last six months. The health professionals have decided to perform more tests to ascertain the primary cause of her medical complication. The team carried out a sodium chloride test. The results of the test confirmed that she had cystic fibrosis. Upon determination of her condition, the lead doctor, Dr. Copeland, instructed all healthcare professionals within and in other partner facilities to adopt the best remedial intervention to save the girl’s life. The kind of interaction shown by the health professionals in treating Caitlynn is an excellent representation of remote collaboration. The health practitioners adopted the use of Skype to communicate amongst themselves from different locations. Therefore, this video will provide a useful reflection on the best evidence and a proposal for an evidenced-based plan. The video will also examine the pros and cons of remote collaboration.
Evidence-Based Care Plan and Patient Safety
It is necessary to ascertain the correct condition of the patient before any treatment can begin. Dr. Copeland and other healthcare professionals ascertained the condition of Caitlynn before they could begin treatment. The health practitioners, including the respiratory therapist, the doctor, and the nurse, considered a healthcare plan that was based on evidence. Currently, there is no specific cure for cystic fibrosis, but the care providers considered a medical intervention that would help the patient to manage the pain and complications associated with the disease. Therefore, the most useful evidence-based care plan that can improve patient safety in the Villa Health scenario is individualized care. In this case, I would propose Caitlynn’s care as the most appropriate evidence-based care that is useful in improving patient safety. The practice takes into consideration the cost of care and the medical expertise and experience of the medical professional team.
Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Model
The EPB model that was adopted in the Villa Health media scenario is known as Johns Hopkins EBP model. Johns Hopkins model is not indicated in the scenario, but it remains evident that the facility adopted the model. Healthcare professionals considered a three-step process in meeting the healthcare needs of the patient. The three-step process addresses the particular care needs of the patient. They comprise of problem identification, selection of the most appropriate evidence and translation of the best evidence into Caitlynn’s care. The EPB model considered by the health professionals provides for the use of tools that guides the actions of healthcare professionals. The tools make use of the findings of the latest scientific studies. As a result, it provides appropriate mitigation strategies for healthcare needs. The John Hopkins EBP model provides for a collaborative approach because it allows for different healthcare professionals to work together to improve patient safety. For instance, after Caitlynn had been released from the hospital, the respiratory therapist, the nurse, and social worker continued to provide healthcare through the assistance of Caitlynn’s mother.
The Most Relevant and Useful Evidence in Making Care Plan Decision
The treatment plan for cystic fibrosis involves different treatment goals. The healthcare professionals involved in managing Caitlynn’s healthcare needs took into account four treatment goals. The healthcare professionals prioritized adequate nutrition, prevention of intestinal blockage, protecting the lungs from any infection, and removal of the mucus present in the lungs. The healthcare providers considered the aerosol treatment and intravenous Piperacillin to manage secretions and bacterial infections, respectively. To manage intestinal blockage, health practitioners considered oral pancreatic enzymes. The treatment method makes it possible for the digestive system to absorb the necessary nutrients. The health professionals have also recommended a diet that is rich in proteins, vitamins, and calories to help in managing the condition of the patient.
Caitlynn is only two years, and managing her condition is somehow complex. The patient is not capable of doing huff breaths to help in managing lung secretions. As a result, the respiratory therapist recommended nebulized aerosol and chest therapy to assist the patient in loosening the mucus. Dr. Copeland went to the extent of seeking clarification from Dr. Benjamin if he could be of help in recommending any therapy that would be of help to Caitlynn.
Benefits and Strategies to Mitigate the Challenges of Interdisciplinary Collaboration
Interdisciplinary collaboration has proved to be useful in enhancing the quality of care. The scenario presented in the Villa Health media case indicates that healthcare professionals can work from varying locations to provide much-needed care. The stakeholders in healthcare used video conferencing technology through Skype to seek the best medical interventions for the patient. Interdisciplinary collaboration makes it possible for healthcare professionals to share knowledge and ideas and the best care practices. Therefore, interdisciplinary collaboration is of great significance to the health professionals, the patient, and family members.
Interdisciplinary collaboration provides it possible for healthcare teams to provide solutions to some of the challenges that they can experience during care delivery. As a result, the care team can work as a team through the shared decision and open communication. Through remote collaboration, Dr. Copeland and his team managed to provide respectful care that took into consideration the needs of the patient and family members. Therefore, remote collaboration contributes to the quality and value-based care that promotes patients and organizational outcomes.