MINOR PROJECT 1
Brenda Bligen
Dr. Kathleen Patterson
LDSL 722: Leaders and Followers
May 24, 2020
Introduction
This paper will focus on providing scholarly definitions and the verified explanations of what followership and leadership are. The affairs of the different understandings of leadership are vital when looking into the possibility related to the knowledge of the societal values, which rise from the various explanations of leadership derived from the defined variables. A preview of the scholarly articles on leadership explained, depending on the matter of familiarity with leadership concerns. The conjoined explanations of leadership and the procedures used in defining direction provide the exact theory of leadership (Northhouse, 2013). Establishing yourself as a follower is not as common as deciding to be a leader. The word leadership is perceived as a role of inducing, which is in pursuit of attaining the primary goals (Uhl-Bien et al., 2014). Kolzow, 2014 additionally analyzed the miniature of definitions of leadership that acknowledged leadership as being developed on two basics: process and behaviors. The above two aspects were crucial in designing the leadership model, which is vital. Consequently, the prescriptions and perception of followership and leadership are primary in raising the context of
Leadership in society.
Leadership
Leadership is a mechanism to alter or build an entity from would, in contrary, be havoc. Leadership should be pliable, and it calls for cognizance, expertise, and empathy. It majorly depends on circumstances (Northouse, 2013). According to Northouse, leadership is having a lot of humanity. A leader explains one, two or even more people who can choose, give and dominate over many followers who have different abilities and making the followers attain the missions and goals of the organization that makes followers to readily enlarge the physical and emotional energy in a harmonized attempt to reach the organizational objectives. In the leadership process, the leaders provide the vision to the present companies’ vision and using the vital thinking skills and expertise, awareness, and usages of mutual communication, such as active listening and positive discourse, which improve followers’ principles and thoughts (Kolzow, 2014).
Leadership is a chain of distinct personalities and characters (Kozlow, 2014). The characteristics are psychological, race, and gender factors. The trait theory explains the particular leaders as people who bare specific features that enable people to be great leaders. According to Kozlow, their people have different perceptions concerning leadership. Some think that leadership is a course of action that is mostly concerned with relationships and interaction of people. Leadership entails clearly understanding change and being able to organize other people’s efforts in different directions. The administration is concerned with more than one person. According to the grand man theory, leaders are persons conjoined with immense attributes and persuasive abilities. Additionally, the leaders are supposed to influence the meaning and importance of gatherings outside the global company’s process and show their implications to the company’s objectives and purpose. The trait theory and the great man’s theory are among the ancient models and methods of leadership.
The leaders can attain their aggregate insights with the followers via honest ways and encouraging better behavior within the followers. Leaders desired to acknowledge the followers’ differences, which are essential in attaining the specific values and objectives devoid of disturbance by the people’s uniqueness. The leaders can achieve their missions via standard flexible ideas of educating, protecting, and supporting the followers (Kozlow, 2014).
Oc and Bashshur 2013 discussed the importance of choosing the appropriate people to attain success in the coming days. The aspect elaborated and supported for leaders to dictate the leadership capabilities and powers in the process of leadership. Leadership isn’t based on a single individual; rather, it concerns concentrating on the followers to attain the objectives and mission of the company. The innovational leaders are capable of moving above the persona likes in favor of the whole organization. However, they further stated that leadership concerned with serving should concentrate on choosing the followers to attain noticeable goals and missions. The two leaderships (Servant and transformation leadership), fits in the present-day perception of leadership programs and process.
The leadership simulation is said to produce a well-arranged effort and implication of the behaviors of the follower. The environment is a vital aspect that affects the future of ecosystems on which chances perceived to be critical in a short while. Steady and easily predictable environments are essential in raising the followers’ performance by enlarging the level of trust and determination with the followers. Oc and Bashshur expound the matter of challenges for the leaders and the companies helpful in inciting the best for the followers. Those kinds of explanations about leadership are in line with systems theory that donates to the well-organized efforts to attain the overall leadership goals. Thus, the collaboration among followers and coordinated efforts are vital in achieving the collaborative objectives in the process of leadership.
For a long time, leadership acknowledged an individual’s quality. Vast philosophers couldn’t draw clear explanations on guidance, but they inspire the leaders to be extra moral and interact well with the surrounding people. As stated by Confucius, the main objective of a leader is service to the people surrounding them. A leader should be an individual who bears great virtues and wise to attract his people’s support.
Kozlow, in 2014, noted the importance of leaders formulating a vision and sharing it amongst other persons. A leader extends an idea that gives a precise point on the duties of other individuals. Those elements happen via the study of programs of social sciences helpful in the comprehension of associations in occurrences of social research. The schemes explanations of leadership that acknowledge leadership as being related to two aspects, such as process and behaviors, were also reviewed. These two concepts were vital in the modeling of leadership, which is primary. The same scholarly works also urged that the administration was concerned with the association process linked to the collective objective achievement. This kind of leadership approach is vital in impacting associations between the followers and the leaders to offer essential changes, including their common objectives.
Followership
Establishing yourself as a follower is not as common as deciding to be a leader. The word leadership is perceived as a role of inducing, which is in pursuit of attaining the primary goals. The term followership is described in researches as a direct factor impacting the part of leadership. Leadership offers several explanations related to followership. On many occasions, followership is the reflector of the process of leadership and sometimes acknowledged as leadership. Followership is a desire to join hands with other people working towards the attainment of the organization’s mission, to showcase a high level of collaboration, and to construct solidarity amid the members of the organization. It is the personal attributes, attitudes, and approaches of people reacting towards leaders (Uhl-Bien et al., 2014).
Kelley’s simulation makes it able for organizations to differentiate the various thoughts and dissenting conceptions of followers. When employers understand the different kinds of followership, it is viable for them to respect the variety and make the most of the excellent features. The two of followership’s models were distinguished as active and passive. The variation between passive and active is strengthening the followers in the process of making decisions. Active followership gains more exceptional ability and participation in helping the leaders to form critical choices.
On the contrary, passive followership is concerned with following orders given by the leaders. There are five patterns related to passive and active followership: sheep, alienated, survivor, yes-people, and ideal followers. The main designs of followership are essential in embracing the negative and positive characteristics (Uhl-Bien et al., 2014).
The sheep are the followers whose thoughts and commitment are unresisting, and they are motivated by the leaders and not themselves. The yes followers give their leaders a chance to decide and take actions on their behalf, they are usually positive, and in most cases, they support their leaders’ decisions. On the contrary, alienated followers are dependent thinkers and are mostly contradictory. Even though these followers think independently, they don’t contribute to pushing the organization towards positive growth. The ideal followers think regardless, bare concrete energy, and diligently commit. They come into terms with their leaders and often give them challenges. Lastly, the survivor followers or the pragmatics show a small degree of commitment as well as independent thinking (Uhl-Bien et al., 2014).
Getting the meaning of the impression of behaviors and attitudes of followership is essential. The kinds of followers taken into records are resources, individualists, partners, and implementers. The followers are duties while implementers gain executive support to dare the extend of norms and values. It’s argued that the followers’ behaviors are related to the leaders’ actions. A great follower must have the ability to accept considerable risks and bold to take vital upright steps when needed. The concept of leadership helps understand the two aspects, such as process and behaviors. Such two issues were prominent in modeling leadership, which is vital (Uhl-Bien and Riggio, 2014).
Additionally, Uhl-Bien and Riggio, in 2014, go further and use the followership simulation given by Kellerman to give more definitions of followership. The model is joining the various followers’ groupings together as well as with their leaders. The chronological order of different levels of followership styles is deployed, starting with the one showing little commitment to the one depicting the highest loyalty to the leader. These styles of followership include the onlookers, crusaders or fighters, conservatives, the separated, and the participator followers.
Regarding the mutual relationship between leaders and followers, a more magnificent model of combining followership and leadership is more concerned with optimizing efficiency in the companies (Uhl-Bien et al., 2014). The definition of followership is essential and is useful in evaluating the followership-leadership relationship. The participation of the changing simulation of followership identifies the two simulations of followership. The two simulations include the aspect of followers and the specific attributes of followers in the promotion of efficient followership. They were capable of looking into the changing concept of the social growth of followership.
The aspect of followership is vital in countering the dissentient theories in the leadership procedure inside the company. Regarding the concepts of a person’s duties, there are three active duties of followership, such as shifting, independent, and interactive. Uhl-Bien and Riggio in 2014 further developed that those three duties drive to the efficiency of the follower-leader engagement. The main focus is the usefulness of followers in expanding the different responsibilities and could make the process of leadership neutral. With an independent objective, the follower could make active responsibilities to clasp circumstances on the undertaking of tasks. Organizational structures should be responsible for the promotion of the duty of the followers (Uhl-Bien and Riggio, 2014). The followers are essential in assisting the leaders in making appropriate decisions. The leaders must strengthen the followers to evaluate the procedure and making necessary changes in integrating the present circumstance to raise the general performance. Non-rigid followership is crucial and always useful in the promotion of responsibility via good hiring. Some of the uncommon abilities of followers are active engagement and critical thinking. An ethical implication for the exercise of great followership is primarily in offering positive donations towards the founding of excellent functioning and organizational groupings with continued programs for quality improvement.
Followership has duties as leadership. Research work clarified that leadership requires willful followership. Other acknowledgment and robust investment would offer the growth of followers in research or the educational stage. According to Northouse, bold followership has to be concerned with the company’s norms, particularly in the types of qualities of leadership. Followership is the possible power balance, in neutralizing the negative implications of leadership inside the company’s structure.
Across the entire followership’s history, the different behaviors are evaluated based on how boldly followers assisted in changing the horrible tyrant and its great rebellion, embracing the known impression of humanity. The leader’s responsibility to embrace response from the followers is vital in improving the compromising effects of the leaders. There are other simulations of leadership explanations that acknowledge leadership as to be related to tow aspects, such as process and behaviors. The above elements were essential in modeling leadership, which is crucial. Leaders should portray constructive action towards the followers because they play a pivotal role in evaluating the truths. The leaders should positively understand and have the right attitude towards followers to act appropriately towards the improvement of the process of followership (Uhl-Bien et al., 2014).
Conclusion
The explanations of followership and leadership are essential in improving the performance and productivity of the community. Figuring out followership is crucial and is useful in evaluating the follower-leader association. The participation and process of the non-rigid simulation of followership depict two concepts in the process of determining followership. The two ideas are the attributes of followers and the aspects of followers to improve followership (Uhl-Bien et al., 2014).
References
Kolzow, D. R. (2014). Leading from within: building organizational leadership capacity.
Oc, B., & Bashshur, M. R. (2013). Followership, leadership, and social influence. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(6), 919-934.
Uhl-Bien, M., Riggio, R. E., Lowe, K. B., & Carsten, M. K. (2014). Followership theory: A review and research agenda. The leadership quarterly, 25(1), 83-104.