Outcomes associated with nutritional status
Introduction and key points
Health outcomes refer to how the body responds to the administration of healthcare interventions and investments. On the other hand, nutritional status refers to the state of a person’s body that results from the intake of certain foods or nutrients either as a result of preference, recommendation, or prescription. Malnutrition can be a form of nutritional status, while prevention of death can be an example of a health outcome. The discussion about the association between nutritional status and the health outcomes is essential due to the dangers involved when the nutritional status of an individual is not as per level expected with respect to this paper. Patients with liver disease need to have proper dietary conditions since their nutritional status determines the quality of life. Malnutrition in cirrhotic patients manifests itself in different ways, mainly being protein-calorie malnutrition, micronutrient deficient, and inadequate nutritional intake in a worst-case scenario. Liver diseases can lead to death. This article gives a summary discourse on the relationship between nutritional status and the health outcomes envisaged in the treatment of liver disease. The report will summarise the arguments made by different authors and draw a conclusion based on the analysis form those three articles.
Article search
Several authors have written about the outcomes associated with nutritional status, with some having a personal bias to liver disease patients. This paper will focus on the insights provided by two major articles and compare their school of thoughts
Article findings
According to (Plauth et al., 2019, p5), it has been two decades before the medicine world could come up with significant milestones that help in the assessment of nutritional status in liver disease patients. The discoveries signify great success and breakthrough research that has been carried for more than 20 years. The study discusses issues arising from nutrition-associated liver injury, which primarily discusses the harm that may occur to a patient if the patient eats foods whose nutritional content may harm the body. The paper further translates the research and the evidence found by the German society of nutritional medicine. (Plauth et al., 2019, p6)
also agree that there should be the anticipation of trace element deficiency, malnutrition, and protein depletion in cirrhosis patients.
Additionally, a patient can suffer acute liver failure as a result of the loss of hepatocellular functions. The effect of such a loss is impaired glucose production in the body. As a result of the discoveries, the authors recommend that patients with liver disease need a total energy supply of 1.3 9bm). The article also holds that after a liver transplant, it should be expected that the body will take time to heal since it takes time to recover body nitrogen. The reason given is that many patients become obese after undergoing a kidney transplant, and for the body to return to normal, it may take up to between fifty and ninety months. This means that the organ transplant alone doesn’t stabilize the dysfunction that a patient may have with the metabolism. These are findings, however, that received divergent opinions, and other scholars dissented to the idea. For example, some authors don’t unanimously agree that the risk of death is caused mainly by obesity. Further, the transplant doesn’t increase the risk of death.
(Huynh et al., 2015) on the other hand, it sought to establish the impact of malnutrition on the clinical outcome of the patients’ assessment. According to the most common cause of death in the liver, patients are malnutrition. The authors, however, note that despite this fact, initial nutrition assessment carried out or conducted on the patient are not helpful since the body keeps metabolizing and as such, the results that may have been arrived at as a result of the test conducted in the morning may indicate changes if done after some time says about twenty-four hours. (Huynh et al., 2015) further states that the distinguishing proof of hunger in patients with liver cirrhosis utilizing common goal wholesome appraisal boundaries is frequently perplexed by non-nutritional factors, including liver engineered work what’s more, liquid status. While multi-compartmental body structure investigations have been utilized to characterize the lack of healthy sustenance in patients with cirrhosis all the more precisely, the cost and absence of accessibility of these methods limits their utilization to the exploration setting
Evidence for practice
The evidence in this paper is going to encourage more research into the issue of the relationship between health outcomes and nutritional status. The only concern I would have is that more research into the topic may lead to differential results and hence inconsistencies.
Sharing evidence
The insights in this paper are essential, and hence I would first share them with my classmates so that they too can get to add more knowledge to themselves. Additionally, I would share it out with other people who would be interested in reading. The easiest way to share the information in this paper is through the use of the internet and social media platforms such as youtube, Facebook, and blogging. Additionally, I can submit it to journals for other scholars and students to benefit.
Conclusion
The paper has discussed the insights of scholarly articles that have talked about the Outcomes associated with nutritional status. Key findings have been made by the researchers involved in the publication of the materials, and these have been very. Both articles have agreed that the leading cause of death among liver patients is malnutrition, which informs the importance of this paper’s basis. The paper argues that it is essential for liver patients to eat well and eat nutrients that are not going to be harmful to their bodies. According to (Plauth et al., 2019), some nutrients, while good to the body, may not be well received by the liver, and this may cause harm to the patient.