PETER SINGER
Peter Singer is a philosopher who is mainly interested in ethics. In his discussions, he mostly explains the need to sacrifice whatever we have so that we can save lives. Many people are suffering out there, and there are only a few people who can help. Singer’s main idea is that charity should be a thing of everyday life. Many are the times that people suffer, and the people around them see it as a usual thing or so much costly. Peter Singer emphasizes that donating our help to vulnerable people or communities does not all rely on our income or any cost. Giving the story about the little girl drowning in the shallow pond is a clear indication of how people live their lives other than saving those in danger. In some aspects, some people see it awkward to take off their clothes or dive with them in a pool of water and to worsen; it can be pond full of mud.
It is logical first to consider the life of the person in danger other than valuing their expensive clothes or shoes. As he describes, all beings are equal, and no one should suffer while others are enjoying it. Charity begins at home simply means that it is the area one is, the common area, or your area of residence/country. It is hard to find someone who cannot offer the little he or she has to help people in other countries. This defines the phrase that charity begins at home. This person cannot even bother donating the little he or she has to help the affected people in their residential area. From the myth of Sisyphus, the idea here is that people struggle so that they attain what they need in life.
People need to accept their state of absurdity as it is healthy. The poor always do their best to attain what they see helpful to them. It can seem to be the duty of a person to donate what they have so that they help those in need. The fact remains that giving comes from the heart of a person and not a duty or responsibility. Some responsible people will always choose to help because of all lives matter. Peter Singer sees it more important for a person to assist where necessary and avoid the death sentence. There are talented people in our society who find it helpful to cut part of their earnings and save the lives of children. In our current community, the charity has been quickly recognized.
People, especially scholars, who have done some research on some aspects, see it essential to include vulnerable groups such as children and women in poverty-stricken areas so that they can help them survive the hard life. According to Peter Singer’s ideology of charity, some opinions have sprung up. For instance, I would suggest that people need to observe the value of life and that life cannot be compared with material things. The price of a shirt cannot be compared to the life of a young child suffering from a situation that can be quickly sorted. One can sacrifice the little they can to help a dying breath. From the TED Talk, the Chinese could save the child’s life, but doing so could be seen as a burden. They could think that life and hospital bills could read under their names, but that is not the case. We choose to help so that lives can run smoothly and also avoid losing someone. Charity is something that should be in everyone’s life.
My other opinion is that people need to sacrifice their time and money to save other people’s lives. The little time you use to help a needy person is more valuable than doing things that please you, and you have left someone suffering somewhere. Besides, money cannot be wasted when attending to someone who is in danger. This includes using the cents you have for life. Many people lose their lives because of others valuing their savings other than considering experience. People need to use their intelligence to make charity effective. Peter Singer’s ideologies on charity are extreme as they emphasize on the kind of people we are living with. People need to have a sense of humor. It is not ethical to find someone suffering or struggling under a particular scenario and just go away. This could be them today, but tomorrow, your deeds shall be paid back.
We simply save starving people so that we can live balanced lives despite social statuses. We should act morally and ethically each day so that we can relieve others from painful acts they experience and develop happiness within them. From the philosopher’s and psychologist’s point of view, students undergo some levels when trying to understand what Peter Singer’s ideas meant. His thoughts are focusing on saving the lives of individuals who are suffering and have reached a stage where they need assistance from the external environment. We are at the scene of the human embryo, according to Peter Singer, as this is the stage where people experience painful experiments and experiences. Life is full of struggles, and people strain to achieve the better part of it. Charity is something that needs to be in every person. It is not good to watch as others suffer from a situation in which you can help them. It might not cost you, but as a result of the actions to be taken to reach there, one needs to think again and again, trying to save a life than preserving material things.
Needy children have been helped since the organizers have seen it necessary to protect the future by providing food and education to those unable to acquire. Opinions have to develop since many people are suffering because of ignorance. The society we are in today requires people who are more creative so that they can employ their knowledge to come up with strategies like charity programs. These charity programs are helpful to vulnerable groups such as the disabled and those in poor communities. Charity begins at home, and thus we need to help those near us before stretching our hands to those in other countries. By doing this, we are capable of enhancing our helping skills and come up with solid plans to ensure that we help those in need. Children need to be protected from any life-threatening factor, as they are the leaders of tomorrow. We should not value our material things when others are out there crying for help. We need to act like humans.
References
Langlois, Anthony J. “Charity and justice in global poverty relief.” Australian Journal of Political Science 43.4 (2008): 685-698.
Kuper, Andrew. “More than charity: cosmopolitan alternatives to the “singer solution.” Ethics & International Affairs 16.1 (2002): 107-120.
Singer, Peter. “The Singer solution to world poverty.” The New York Times Magazine 5.September (1999): 60-63.
MacAskill, William. “Effective altruism: introduction.” Essays in Philosophy 18.1 (2017): 1-5.