Rhetorical Essay Assignment
Jim Harris is an environmentalist from Canada. He is known for his efforts to ensure that the environment, especially in Canada. One of is essays that he is famous for is the UnAtomic Age. The essay was written in October 2014 and explained the expenses that are caused by nuclear power. Based on the way he framed the speech, the general public waste audience. It was written in a somewhat easy language that anyone with simple education standards could understand the content o the paper. It also explains why civilians in the nation are more likely to suffer due to the introduction of nuclear energy. In addition to that, the essay uses real-life examples such as the taxes that the people of Japan pay for errors such as nuclear reactions, among others. Based on the knowledge about the author, e is an expert in environmental conservation. Jim Harris was involved in the making of the Green party of Canada. His success in politics makes him a valuable asset in environmental conservation. The core idea that the writer had was that nuclear power is unaffordable. Based on the expenses associated with the failures and the expenses associated with setting up the plants. This paper is an analysis of the essay by Jim Harris expressing the unaffordability of nuclear energy.
The central thesis in the papers is that Nuclear power is unaffordable. It is associated with failures that are catastrophic such as the Fukushima Incident in Japan. He highlights that 400000 people were displaced after a mess in the nuclear power plant. The effects are still felt after three years since the incident happened. To cater to such negative consequences, the nations that invest in nuclear power plants need to continuously service them. In addition to the maintenance costs, nuclear power plants may need frequent upgrades that require millions of dollars to run. The author justifies the essay’s thesis by giving real-life example s based on current statistics about the new technology. In giving explanations that entail real-life events, a pattern can be deciphered to show that the nuclear plant is overly expensive—the writer manages to capture the audience’s attention in several ways. By starting the essay with a catastrophe in Japan, the audience is more attracted to know more about the causes of the incident. The starting also explains some core aspects of the field of radioactivity and nuclear fission. It gives the writer a brief description of the content being discussed in the paper.
The core supporting points that the essay has are the real-life explanations of the incidences that have happened over the years. There is also statistical data about the costs of maintaining a nuclear power plant, the amounts of money needed to fix nuclear fission errors, and more. The supporting detail is very accurate since it has figures and numbers that are accurate. It is based on real-life events that happened due to nuclear emissions making it even more compelling. The writer also highlights the statements at the beginning of the paragraphs. They are seen as topic sentences since they describe what will be discussed in the paragraph. The sentences offer incites on the details of the crisis resulting from nuclear emissions.
The essay is cpmp[osed of a dominant rhetorical pattern. It is the means that the writer uses to analyze the core thesis of the paper. The author uses the cause and effect method to ensure that the changes they link are well explained. For example, he explains that the reason nuclear power is unaffordable is that there is the payment of hefty taxes made by the people in the nations that embrace it. He also explains that there are many risks, such as leaks in the power plants that are a significant threat to human life. The essay does not have stress on the synthesis of the essay. The author uses facts and studies that have been conducted earlier to explain the points that they have in mind. One of them is the statistical data that has been collected about Fukushima. It is based on news sources and government databases and has a long explanation of why we are humans should not allow nuclear emissions. The author also collects data from scholarly sources. These are sources that have been approved by the scholars as accurate and useful in data collection. They are more reliable since they are analyzed several times before they are published. In doing so, the author ensures that the data is accurate, and there is no fake news. It would be ne unwise to use blogs as sources of information since some may be inaccurate and based on fallacies, not statistical data.
The author uses academic language throughout the essay. It is seen in the means that are used to convey the data. Points are explained in simple terms and data cited from relevant sources. In addition to that, they stick to third person statements in the paper to make the essay more passive. There are no feelings explained by the writer. This makes the essay more formal. The use of formal language is also enhanced by statistical data to explain the main points. They are better argumentative compared to informal statements. The author does not express bias since all the data collected is based on the facts about the expenses posed by radioactivity. It is vital to create the impression that they are unbiased. The author avoids using obscene language in the paper sine it is unethical. The author also avoids any emotions on the paper.
The conclusion is a summary of the main points that were being discussed in the essay. It also repeats the thesis of the paper by pointing out how the other paragraphs explain it. The conclusion is effective since it sums up the main ideas of the paper in question.