Role of Safety Culture
The culture of safety in an organization ensures a high degree of significance on safety values, beliefs, and attitudes. A culture mostly shared by a large number of people within the organization. Safety way of life term first appeared in the Nuclear Agency report on a 1986 disaster involving the Chernobyl. Concepts of safety culture in an organization done seriously when the organization sets up services and systems designed to share set and implement safety behaviors from production to marketing. Organizations have to change regularly and also try to maintain the highest standards of security and safety of workers to deal with the challenges and stay competitive. The importance of safety way of life in an organization is that it acts as a connection between situational controls, which generates embedded, intersected subcultures set within a permeable boundary in an organization—ideas corporatizing culture challenged by fragmentation outlook. Managers in the organization view safety as sharing moral behaviors about safety as self-prevention of risks.
At the same time, experts define safety through safety standards, strategies that avoid hazards, and thorough safety management needs. Culture of the organization as a root of the safety culture creates source information that generates employees with emotional potential, which exerts their expectations and stimulates a change in their potential. Through it, feelings of self-efficacy enhanced among the workers in the organization. Safety custom builds motivation potential among the employees. Oldham and Hackman created the motivational medium used to detect the employees’ motivational abilities, the fulfillment with the work, and achievements brought by work. A postmodern employee is the owner of the project, goal setter, assessor of accomplishments, and directly with the other workers. With all these, he plays the role of planning safety in the company workplace and its quality. The organization’s motivational point of view affects the inside motivation of the worker based on a perception of security in the workplace and safety about the environment externally; this ensures he becomes a builder of the company’s safety culture internally and externally (Milan). This building program of security custom of a company builds socially and affects the understood influence of the safety events, measures, rules, and behaviors. It states that organizational tradition is a social creation of perceptions, ideas, and attitudes towards the external world and can influence individuals’ actions and values. Though technology is coming up to be a solving aspect towards health, safety, and environment, organizational characteristics and human factors are essential in improving performance and safety in an organization that is ready to learn, showing that safety customs affect and are affected by systems of the organization.
Measuring security can portray either a small view of what is going on or a macro picture of performance, and it goes to the individual level. Both aspects are essential in figuring out what is going on in the organization—safety bars in an organization taken to prevent any kind of accidents from happening. Challenges of measuring security include the desire to do so, and managers of safety explain in terms of Safety Performance Indicators. They use these indicators to get a quantitative idea of the healthiness of the security. To measure whether safety is improving or dropping in performance and compare safety. Safety indicators can give data such as early cautions showing a severe accident or incident that may happen. The data can show how often preset limitations are exceeded or breached, how ready are employees in submitting and completing voluntary reports of safety. Performance indicators can demonstrate the effectiveness of new strategies, frequency on how events of the same species are occurring, and distinct information benchmarks for new practices to measure initiatives. With many accidents that happened throughout the decades, Congress effected the Occupational Safety and Health Act, which controls organizations’ safety and health in different sectors. The purpose of the act is to ensure that safety customs in an organization adhered to; workers are working in an area free from hazards such as high levels of noise, toxic materials, and not sanitary conditions. OSHA helped invent awareness of the need to continue improving safety in the aviation sector and in other industries. Though priorities of organization measures only on profits, they should always strive to ensure they operate and safely achieve gains. They remember the Boeing stock story stating that there is still a direct link between profit and safety hence improving the organization positively. The role of safety customs in an organization is to create an environment for both workers and safety managers to perform different tasks together, promoting various trainees in the organization and helping it run effectively. Safety customs take into thought existence, reality, and knowledge the world has to offer. In conclusion, safety customs top priority is ensuring nobody gets hurt and shows that safety is critical in commercial areas; deterioration of security brings financial problems, and strong safety promotes profits.
Critical success factors in sustaining a positive just safety culture
The success of any organization relies on critical success factors (CFS’s). CFS’s act as primary performance bars that know how to track and define how relatable processes should work to considered successful since they are considered strategic and seen to be objective in various plans and goals of a business. Critical factors promote the attainment of goals in an organization, and if successful, it makes the organization more competitive. Arguments exist that some CFCs are related to designs of the industry; others are justified by factors of the environment, and also others depend on some temporal factors that take a reasonable time. According to Garvin, for instance, he illustrates success characters as an element of system excellence, including performance, reliability, durability, features, conformance, and aesthetics. An Organization identifies itself through the external and internal environment. Corresponding to that, CFCs has two aspects; internal CFC’s which the company can influence themselves, for example, the workers, communication, entrepreneurism cost, external which are independent of company actions, and are affected factors from external surroundings like technology and customers. Safety custom is claimed to be positioned at the heart of collective duties and affects a company’s CFCs.
Safety debated as the most critical performance measure of a company’s ability effectiveness, and unhealthy safety considered as a failure of management organization. It can significantly impact the relationship with the shareholders, customers, employees, community at large and media. Security felt the heart of a corporate because it is moral and ethical with long term results. Control relations between stakeholders is essential since it promotes competitiveness, ensures chances for later development, enhances loyalty from customers, creates motivation among employees, and promotes transparent operations. Though there is no excellent way to manage, control, and help organizations in the safety zone, the corporate ruling requires organizations to create lists of risks they are likely to go through regardless of their financial state. It can help them from time to fit any situational risk. The critical growth of a project is essential for most organizations, the government, and communities. The project can be said to be successful when completed on time, with the budget agreed upon, good quality, and no workplace hazards. In a state, CFC does not concern the current requirements. The programs will fail disastrously. With all that said, consideration of creating a lineup of different critical factors should consider for cultural development.
Factors of safety in the development of Safety customs, according to experts, include; clear goals established to provide a way of direction for workers to work towards and act as a goal against which safety can be measured. Authority and obligations should be assigned to employees that can handle safety measures and to take proper actions. Teamwork through all workers at different levels must be involved in safety activities; hence collective strength is a way of increasing safety. Required source allocation, such as staff, money, and machinery, is used to do exercises for long and short terms. Leadership is concerned in ensuring that the organization’s safety management is implemented and developed; generally, management and leadership commitment are essential components of safety culture. Safety meetings are also crucial in the success factors in improving the development of formal security and should be held occasionally to check on records on safety. Communication between workforce and management should be open as this enables workers to bring any safety problems they are encountering in the workplace. An efficient scheme can be developed and be implemented to make sure employees adhere to safety regulations. The motivation of decision is a relevant directive that resulted in the fact that the choice’s actions will be going towards expected purpose and way. Loud noises can make workers wiggle and thus creating an unreasonable assessment of self-risk adherence. Conflicts should be resolved quickly by the project participants to prevent overlooking of safety in an example of heavy work assigned. Workers’ physical health afflicts what they can endure, type of quality they can take, and their ability to face risks. Professional intelligence can affect employees directly when encountering with project problems and can affect different tolerance of risk. Critical success factors ensure the knowledge of an individual. Workers require ethical norms in growing their areas, which involves training to enable them to make the right decisions and improve their abilities in the field (IOP Publishing). The safety presentation plan is presented at meetings of preparation of the construction to be signed and approved. The contractor is reporting any accidents happening at the workplace as they also happen a factor of safety. Performance improvements are to be implemented according to the evaluation results on performance. It ensures the effectiveness and suitability of application. Other security elements that promote its success depend on employees’ participation in activities that they create themselves. Finally, workers should have a chance to input ideas into the project’s designs and implementations by participating in safety committees and helping in investigations of accidents.
Contribution to the Overall Safety Management
Safety customs and Critical Success Factors play an essential role in organizations and affect the world outside the organization. For example, the health industry, where research states that it is a leading death case, is happening because of medical errors in the United States every year. Employees involved should know their purposes in that industry, train to create perfection in them to prevent mistakes from time to time (Cusick et al. 3). An organization’s culture of safety impacts safety results. Research shows when culture is dangerous, accidents reduce and become less severe; hence safety customs can be a priority in the transportation industry. System Management Systems are not only for the aviation industry. They are in various sectors such as construction, health, electrical, food, and highway. Safety Risk Management helps to control hazardous situations. It identifies some steps in hazard control, which are to ensure the danger is identified and recognized, select and determine danger controls, designate obligation in implementation control, and monitor and measure control effectiveness. Assessing and selecting danger controls through identifying dangers, knowing kind of outcome from the hazard, evaluate those capabilities for risk. Controls are said to reduce the risk, and finally, recalculation of the threat is done to assess relating risks to determine whether it can be accepted. The hazard method of control makes sense when calculations of risks involve the use of specific machinery that has been in use for years. In this method, apart from majoring on the issue that was intellectually solved long ago significant on the system used to reduce the hazard, and though this method is not entirely, capable SMS surveyor would find data used to explain those failures causes. Focusing on danger control, one uncovers a character of safety management that must be fixed before operations are done. An essential view of hazard measures is that it helps focus resources from the beginning of crucial questions affecting the efficiency of controls and relatable risks should it fail. Hazard methods create on what is already in existence and do not entirely focus on methodology measurements of those measures. Assigning obligations for control implementations once danger measures are known, obligations for implementation control must be allocated to appropriate workers. In management safety assurance, measuring and monitoring the effectiveness of action is done by managing quality accomplished through auditing internally, evaluating systems, and analysis (Goglia et al. 251). Quality promises focus on showing the need for excellence have been attained, it is all about information-driven decision making, and SMS programs have no difference.
The application of threat matrix in system plans can contribute to the safety of management; it gives the workforce an idea to consistently and methodically decide if the system can be implemented in future form or if additional activities need action. The other setting in which threat matrix is used in a company that has obtained SMS is in safety drive relating decisions. The professional specialist may be involved in the making of resolutions or not; it ensures the entire workforce is designed to provide trustworthy appropriate, and consistent guidance for the decisions to be made. The SMS specialist is mostly involved in plans of the processes and policies and does not take part in the decision making of individuals. Final manipulation of the method of systems that gives an address to management replies to risk ensures that the policies have teeth. Thirdly consider likelihood and severity ways. Many service providers are already adopting the threat matrix and have been involved in a significant number of activities to clarify definitions of severity and likelihood ways. At the end of the discussion, use the threat matrix in process plans in a tiny harsh way stating that it is not the right tool for all events. The use of threat matrix in identifying threats involved with activities observations is most challenging. From the planning point, it makes spontaneous sense that states starting by knowing dangers first and move to possible possibilities, threats of results through S/L method, and later control applications (Goglia et al. 146). In reality, that is not how threat assessment in action avails itself; one starts with real events, risks manifest, and works towards achieving the SMS specialist’s primary goal. Complications present themselves immediately. Although a safe way of life is hard to define and explain, it should be more alert in identifying potential dangers and establishing reducing measures. Safety customs are said to be penetrating, creating an expectation that employees will adopt security as a significant concern of duties. Managers will follow safety thoughts in their decisions, and management will involve famous safety lines and contacts in their goals and visions. The whole company will raise safe norms and administer punishment to those who omission and don’t pay attention to commit to safety.
Works Cited
Cusick, S. K., et al. Commercial Aviation Safety. 6th ed., 2017.
Goglia, Jj J., et al. Safety Management System in Aviation. 2008.
IOP Publishing. 333003593_Critical_Success_Factors_to_Improve_Safety_Culture_on_Construction_Project_in_Indonesia, 2018,
Milan A. “Safety Culture in an organization.” https://www.researchgate.net/publication/279756899_Safety_culture_in_organization, 2015,