Teleology ethical approach

Teleology ethical approach

Teleology ethical approach, also known as consequentialism, focuses on the ultimate result of an action and evaluating whether it is worth without minding if the act is right or wrong (Vallentyne, 1987). It entails past evaluation practices to determine the end product of the current actions. Individuals who adopt a teleological ethical approach believe that the end justifies the means, and therefore, one should what they have to, and deal with the consequences later, provided their actions give them maximum happiness. On the other hand, deontological ethical approach, also known as duty-based ethics, focuses on analyzing motive behind every step in a bid to determine whether an act is right or wrong, regardless of its results (Vallentyne, 1987). Individuals who believe in deontological ethical approach value, fairness, and put the interests of others before their own.

Based on a teleological ethical approach, the researcher would agree to the deal, and execute the manager’s idea even though it is based on personal interest rather than the common good of the company. On the other hand, using a deontological ethical approach, the researcher would decline the offer from the manager, since the deal appears to be driven by personal interests rather than the common good of the organization.

The researcher would decline the offer from the manager since they believe the situation should be addressed using the deontological approach. Whether the scrap material is the legal property of the company or not, the researcher believes that the action is wrong because it is purely based on personal interests rather than the interests of the company as a whole. To them, condoning such a practice is self-destructive based on their moral beliefs and personal values. It is worth mentioning that it is the duty of the supervisors and managers to come up with innovative ideas to help the company grow.