The article, The Power of the Brush
The article, The Power of the Brush: Protest Art in the Philippines (1st in a series), is written by Johnalene Baylon, an outline of how art is a powerful tool. In this document, more attention is pant to the work of art achieved through paintbrushes. The latter is captured as the weapon to create a means of waging war. The author gives details on what painting brush is capable- to drive away tyrant forces, and attack corrupt administrations. In the Philippines, history has seen conquest after conquest, with Filipinos being the winner in fighting against independence. According to the author, what people ought to know is that artists have taken steps in protest activities, and their contribution has seen a significant impact. The article outlines a few artistic works that have been used in protests, and this paper, I will analyze, argue, give opinion add ideas on top of this material.
By analysis, artists play an essential role in illuminating, challenge, and critique injustices that impact the lives of citizens in places such as the Philippines. Artistic work provides the voice for those who cannot speak and induce the ability to reach a multitude via vision. Human rights art has consumed direct messages in tolerant eras. Artists inform the understanding of Philippines aesthetics as values changing and growing with socio-economic, political, or socio-religious issues. One famous art is by Pablo Baen Santos, of the year 1986- oil on canvas. The art is entitled congratulation to liberal democrats and shows a woman celebrating the victory of politics. The woman in the art is an embodiment of the Philippine flag. In as much art is an excellent form of communication, and so much meaning can be deduced from them, they are highly condemned for provocations.
In the year 2019, four Filipinos artist were arrested and beaten by police after painting protest messages in Manila. As such, street art can be looked down on by authorities. In most states, arts for protest is depicted as a form of vandalism even though they have become part of human beings’ way of expression. At one point, we have all encountered protests either in writings, through songs or painting. As such, some people recoil at the concept of the protest.
I think protest art existing to condemn the structures that shackle artists. In its meaning =, protest art is an act of revolution. When employees create a mural that shows struggles in their union, it is both an indictment of the society that oppresses them and also a way to create a product, that is theirs. In situations where students write revolutionary change on walls or streets, to me is a call for action and a way to express their stifled voice. As such, protest art is Identity.
As one of the prominent painters, Pablo Picasso, said, “No, painting is not done to decorate the building, but it is an instrument of war to attack enemies.” I would add that painting or protest art is an expression of love for the country. Nationalism and art have been one thing. Art reminds the effort people, especially the oppressed men and women have endured under the hands of their leaders. Protest art is a voice that has shaped many nations into how they are today. I conclude by saying, protesting through the use of art and painting is a historical act that will not cease because it is people’s power of expression.