This essay has been submitted by a student. This is not an example of the work written by professional essay writers.
Uncategorized

The GDP per capita in three regions

Pssst… we can write an original essay just for you.

Any subject. Any type of essay. We’ll even meet a 3-hour deadline.

GET YOUR PRICE

writers online

The GDP per capita in three regions

 

Introduction

There has been a running debate on what makes the Growth

Domestic Product per Capita of a country or region grows. Several variables may

help forecast GDP, including population, industrialization, minerals, labor,

and many more. This report aims to look at three regions, mostly third

world countries and a developed area. The topic of investigation will be if the

labor force can impact the GDP of a place. Also, the report will check how the

GDP varies across the three regions and, correspondingly, check how the

labor force also varies. The three areas that will be featured are Africa

(Saharan), Africa (sub-Saharan), and the Middle East.

Investigation 1:

It will involve the comparison of the mean GDP per capita

and mean labor force of the three sub-regions, Africa (Saharan), Africa

(sub-Saharan), and the Middle East.

Mode of investigation:

Descriptive statistics, bar charts, and boxplots of the four variables will be used for comparison purposes:

Descriptive statistics:

Explanation:

The data is used to check the descriptive analysis of the

two variables within the three sub-regions. From the 73 cases of the countries that were sampled, the data can ascertain that the mean of the labor force in the

sub-regions is 7962809.12, with a standard deviation of 1129949.48. From the

summary, the data shows that the minimum labor force in the regions is 2486,

and the maximum labor force is 58800000. Upon checking the dispersion through

the interquartile range, 907600 shows a considerable gap between the countries

with low labor force and nations with a high labor force in the combined

regions.

Explanation:

The data was sought out to check the dispersion of the

GDP variable among the three sub-regions. It is clear that the Middle East has

fewer countries, but their cumulative mean GDP is high at 35,000, with the

lowest being Africa Sub Saharan region with 5000 cumulative means. Africa

Saharan is better peaking above 10,000. It shows that even though Africa has

many countries, the GDP is not still hence indicating that many countries in

Africa has a low GDP. In contrast, in the Middle East, the states are few, but

most of the states have very high GDP.

The data was used in checking the dispersion of the labor

force among the three sub-regions. Here Africa Saharan peaks with the highest

of the three at 12,000,000, with the Middle east being the lowest at just over

6,000,000. The Africa sub-Saharan is also relatively higher, with 8,000,000.

This chart shows that Africa has a high labor force relative to the Middle

East, but the GDP lags. That poses the question as to why the Middle East has

the least labor force, yet it has a higher GDP and a correlation between GDP

and labor force.

Explanation:

The boxplots helped in checking on the distribution of

the variables relative to the mean. In this first boxplot of the GDP per capita

in the three regions, the middle east shows that the greater percentage of GDP

is actually on the higher side with even an outlier on the top section. This

outlier is brought about by Qatar with a GDP of 132100, showing that it has a

high GDP. African Saharan shows that the majority of the GDP lies above the

mean. The Africa sub-Saharan shows that it is on the lower side. Still, with

the majority of the countries placed above the mean with even noticeable

outliers on the higher side, for example, the starred outlier at 20 belongs to

Equatorial Guinea with 31800.

In this second

boxplot of the labor force in the three regions, the middle east shows that the

greater percentage of labor is actually on the higher side with even a starred

outlier on the top section. This outlier is brought about by turkey with a

labor force of 30240000. African Saharan shows the majority of the GDP lies

below the mean. The Africa sub-Saharan shows that it is balanced at the top and

bottom of mean with even noticeable outliers on the higher side. For example,

the starred outlier at 39 belongs to Nigeria with 58800000.

Investigation 2:

The correlation

between GDP per capita and Labour force and regression analysis of the two

variables in the three sub-regions will be investigated. It will be determined

whether there is sufficient evidence to use the labor force to predict the GDP.

Mode of investigation:

The data will be analyzed using a scatterplot diagram, a

correlation table, and a regression table

Scatter plot:

Explanation:

The scatterplot shows the relationship between the GDP

per capita and the labor force of the regions. The line passing through

scattered points indicates that the relationship is relatively weak. The

decreasing linear relationship shows that GDP lowers as the labor force

decreases in the three regions.

Correlation table:

Explanation:

The correlation table shows that the Pearson correlation

lies at -0.119 hence showing that the linear relationship between GDP and labor

force is a negative one. The relationship is relatively weak. The sig value

indicates that there is no significant relationship at the 0.01 level of

significance.

Regression table:

Explanation:

This regression table determines if the labor force can

be used to predict the GDP of the three regions. By checking on the R-Square

the segment, the data shows 0.014, which translates to 1.4%. It means that only

1.4% of labor force data can be used to explain the GDP of the region. The

value is relatively low. Also, on checking the coefficients on the table, the

labor force lies at 000 because there is a sig value of 0.319, showing that there

is no significant relationship to predicting the GDP of the three regions. It

proves that the size of the labor force does not necessarily mean a high GDP;

other factors fuel GDP to grow.

Conclusion

Hence, from the above data, it can be concluded that the Middle East region has a high GDP

compared to the two areas of Africa (Saharan and Sub Saharan). In contrast, the

African regions have a higher labor force than the Middle East. The data sought

to figure out if the labor force affects the GDP and if there is a relationship

between the two variables. Moreover, correlation and regression analysis show

that there is a negative and weak relationship between the two variables. Therefore,

the labor force cannot predict the GDP of the three regions.

References

Fauzi, A., & Pradipta, I. W. (2018). Research methods

and data analysis techniques in education articles published by Indonesian

biology educational journals. JPBI

(Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 4(2),

123-134.

Little, R. J., & Rubin, D. B. (2019). Statistical analysis with missing data (Vol. 793). John Wiley & Sons.

  Remember! This is just a sample.

Save time and get your custom paper from our expert writers

 Get started in just 3 minutes
 Sit back relax and leave the writing to us
 Sources and citations are provided
 100% Plagiarism free
error: Content is protected !!
×
Hi, my name is Jenn 👋

In case you can’t find a sample example, our professional writers are ready to help you with writing your own paper. All you need to do is fill out a short form and submit an order

Check Out the Form
Need Help?
Dont be shy to ask