The sustainability and establishment of public spaces

The sustainability and establishment of public spaces

The sustainability and establishment of public spaces face a fundamental challenge in the lack of deliberate efforts to improve the streets. There is an urgent need to consider the progress achieved in other areas, including roads and eateries. Failure to create and enhance public spaces aligns with being aware of the essence addressed to the public. Relevant stakeholders fail to account for the dynamics of the public spaces as they do to other developments. It will be challenging to sustain the public spaces as long as people do not picture the essence of authentic socialization. There is a need to focus on effortless elements such as compassion for nature and other people. Rather than focusing on development and success for the better part of human life, people can invest in natural aesthetics. Major cities are the primary focus for supporting multiple facilities and functionalities. A fundamental problem arises regarding the planning and development processes. Public spaces require a sense of flexibility and compassion, unlike other setups, where there is an ease of predicting social behavior and activities. It is necessary to sensitize different players regarding the essence of public spaces beyond the fundamental principle of socializing. Public spaces induce a natural experience, synonymous with psychological relive and coexistence.

Various challenges arise in creating and preserving public spaces. Ideological differences arise as the core of the underlying limitations in different ways. The fact that the essence of public space may not be known to everyone is the main issue. It is based on the various debates surrounding the preservation and creation of public spaces that serve collective interests (Hölscher et al. 843). For instance, parks can serve an infinite number of people across generations. Also, one can use public space without interference from the state and members of the public. The other element revolves around divergent interests between broad categories of people. It covers different parties, including the agencies that should be at the forefront of protecting public spaces, including the government and environmental management entities. Such stakeholders may lack the motivation to align with the universal cause of actions regarding the natural environment. The inclination to have competing interests regarding the public spaces, including the development of investment projects, is one of the inescapable barriers.

The public may also be at the forefront of constraining the creating and preserving public spaces. Jenny Odell’s book, How to Do Nothing offers a profound analogy regarding human and civil liability in hurting the environment. The primary problem entails revering materialism at the expense of the things that create a universal benefit across generations (Odell 25). Despite the world’s series of developments, chiefly regarding technology, the future appears to be darkening even more. Treasuring careerism is one of the immediate indicators of the glaring threats to the essence of public spaces. It is impossible to protect or establish public spaces if people do not value nature in the first space. Jenny Odell finds that humans are increasing, revering their professional success at the expense of social and natural fulfillment. The pattern compares to the actions of the state and private sectors where investment and competitiveness are the driving forces. The search for the best career compares with the overemphasis on respectable living as a characteristic trend in modern life. While it is necessary to search for dignity, being respected must not come at the expense of damaging collective values. The author finds that careerism and the pressure to embrace a respectable living limits participation in corporate events and processes.

Creating and preserving public spaces is complex and continuous, such that it is beyond a single endeavor. Jenny Odell’s book, How to Do Nothing, induces the idea of socially sanctioned excellence, suggesting the participation of different public sections. Therefore, a fundamental challenge to the sustainability and establishment of public spaces pertains to the lack of deliberate efforts to change the face of the streets (Odell 30). It is necessary to consider the progress achieved in other areas, including roads and eateries. People have devoted themselves to making such spaces conducive to crowding. Some of the inescapable modifications include security and space. It is based on the realization that people yearn for comfort. The idea of serenity is also vital to the change in public spaces. It is challenging to create and sustain a public as the development process tends to miss out on the required sense of humanity and social acceptability. While the state may be devoted to allocating public spaces, it is the citizens’ role to demonstrate the essence of the natural features. The lack of deliberate actions to create and improve public spaces aligns with being aware of the reality addressed to the public. The state and the society fail to account for the dynamics of the public spaces as they do to other developments. It will remain challenging to sustain the public spaces as long as people do not picture the essence of authentic socialization. Unlike other platforms where people embrace the duty to adopt specific standards, public spaces induce a natural experience, synonymous with psychological relive and coexistence.

There are various explanations regarding the existence of challenges to the public spaces. Jenny Odell’s book, How to Do Nothing offers a profound explanation of the underlying failures and contentions. The authorship offers a mind-blowing explanation of the critical importance of doing nothing. Therefore, one of the foundations to the inhibited creation and sustainability of public spaces entails rethinking the individual relationship with the worlds and the natural forms. One does not need to induce any change or take any action. On the contrary, it is necessary to focus on effortless elements such as compassion for nature and other people. Jenny Odell felt that rather than focusing on development and success for the better part of human life, people could invest in the things that do not require any physical efforts or money (Hölscher et al. 845). Natural aesthetics form one of the vital aspects developed in the book. The essence of doing nothing suggests large sections of human needs are already in existence or cannot be altered. Therefore, failure to acknowledge the aesthetic elements of human living will lead to constraining public spaces.

The underlying problems also emanate from refusal to coexist. The essence of public space is to live cooperatively. It implies that one is not limited to engaging another person beyond the professional and cultural norms. The underlying problems also exist due to the failure to integrate different elements of the public spaces. Infrastructure is a core element of social development for any country or community. Major cities are the primary focus based on the inclination to support multiple facilities and functionalities. However, there is a fundamental problem regarding the planning and development processes. Unlike other setups, where there is an ease of predicting public behavior and activities, public spaces require a sense of flexibility and compassion. However, it is difficult for the developers to define such needs even in cases where investors are devoted to supporting the essential needs (Shenker). The other dimensions of the source of the problem are based on social classes as an element of public spaces planning. The existing public spaces are part of the underlying problem based on the limited capacity to manifests compassion and inclusivity. Therefore, it is increasingly difficult to live up to the ideals of public space. Such an establishment is meant to solve the problem of social disparities.

Various recommendations come in handy to create and preserve wide and equal access to public space. One of the lasting options is to link the essence of public space to a lasting cause. Healthcare is one of the common and universal elements that can be used to improve the creation and preservation of natural elements (Shabi). Public space is a major deviation to other avenues that have been linked to a public health disaster. The increasing threats of lifestyle diseases are one of the ideal explanations for the underlying issue. People have become obsessed with comfort and success that is conspicuously linked to individualism. The result includes physical and psychological damage to members of the public. Therefore, it is necessary to sensitize different players regarding the essence of public spaces beyond the basic essence of socializing and conceptualizing aesthetics and compassion. Public health transcends the physiological dimensions of human wellness. Also, it is a strategy for enhancing the social health of the community. The integration of digital technologies, especially in various telecommunication networks, has led to increasing individualism and limited physical contact. Therefore, it is necessary to induce an appreciation of nature and interaction beyond the digital and individual spaces. The underlying health benefits revolve around encouraging compassion and shaping social interaction. Therefore, it is necessary to affirm the dynamism of public spaces based on internal and external benefits. Various stakeholders, including the state and community, need to rethink the public space plan regarding sensitization an execution. The immediate strategy entails getting a comprehensive plan as opposed to a static procedure. It means that the execution of a public space plan does not and with securing land and establishing relevant premises. On the contrary, it involves understanding community needs and working towards offering lasting solutions. The development of an ideal public space requires the participation of different categories of people and commitment to arrive at solutions that manifests collectiveness. The process must also accommodate diversity and continuity while reacting to different expectations (Public Health in Modern America, 1890-1970). However, it is imperative to acknowledge that public place’s success relies on the existing leadership, chiefly those who hold vital resources. The public can only serve as references to the agenda that can be achieved using public spaces. However, it is upon the leadership to facilitate the achievement of the required outcomes. The continuity of public spaces’ modification also reveals a need to start small and make progressive development. Existing public space can require major modifications to suit public needs.

Therefore, an ideal public space needs to manifest individual and social needs. The assessment affirms that the fact that the essence of public space may not be known to everyone is the main issue at hand. The various debates surrounding the preservation and creation of public spaces need to serve collective interests. The state and the public may lack the motivation to align with the natural environment’s universal cause of actions. Having competing interests regarding public spaces is one of the inescapable barriers. People cannot protect public spaces if they do not value nature in the first space. On the other hand, humans are increasingly revering their professional success at the expense of social and natural fulfillment. The state and private sector manifest with investment and competitiveness, acting as the driving forces. The underlying challenges emanate from refusal to coexist, given that the essence of public space is to live in a cooperative way. Therefore, it is increasingly difficult to live up to the ideals of a public space despite realizing that such an establishment is meant to solve the problem of social disparities. There is indeed a need to focus on effortless elements such as compassion for nature and other people instead of focusing on development and success for the better part of human life. The process covers limiting the inclination to have competing interests regarding the public spaces, including the development of investment projects.