Trial of a minor
According to Proposition 21, states that a minor can be tried as an adult if they have committed serious offenses like murder and other sex offense. In this proposition, it shows how stringent punishment on juvenile offenders to get tried in adult court. In this case, it means that they would be put in adult prisons. When juvenile offenders put in maximum correctional facilities, then it would put their lives in danger from assault discrimination in adult prisons. The proposition further shows that probation is available for juvenile felons. It also explains that no confidentiality protections for juvenile offenders. Gang-related offenders would mean higher sentences or increased criminal penalties. The summary for proposition 57 is that it enhances the aspect of public safety. In this proposition, it tends to emphasize rehabilitation, rather than federal courts releasing inmates without caution. In accordance with Proposition 57, states that “CDCR incentivizes inmates to take responsibility for their own rehabilitation…” The fact that sustaining good behavior through in-prison program and activities participation is highly advised.
On a personal perspective, I’m afraid I have to disagree with the proposition 21, and it tends to argue that individuals who are minor to be tried in adult court. This proposition supports the aspect of adult court for serious offense for minor individuals. I feel that putting a 14-year-old in correctional facilities with adult criminals is unethical and dangerous regardless of the crime. It is vital to have punishing methods for minors who commit serious crimes in order to avoid recidivism. The position for proposition 57 argued that rehabilitation and giving parole to nonviolent members to integrate into society is a good idea. I support the arguement as I agree that rehab is very effective in monitoring behavior both in prison and society. Proposition 57 contend that enhancing and giving inmates skills which are essential to be used in society.