Universal healthcare
The student notion regarding the continual process regarding universal healthcare and the systems embracing stateside debate is accurate, given there are many improvements needed to be coupled with the opportunity for better enactments. The inference concerning the inception of government-endorsed benefits in the U.S is wrong; the first instance involves the passing of the Federal public health law regarding the sick and disabled Seamen in 1798 by President John Adams which was the initial prepaid medical care plan in the nation. Reports by the WHO supports the claim of large portions of the American population exhibiting lack of healthcare coverage despite the existence of Medicare and Medicaid. Lessons have indeed been learned regarding poorly-funded systems as the adversities are the effect which ACA sought to avoid through gradual and ideal enactment. The submission regarding borrowing from prior acts of legislation in setting up typical systems that are an improvement from the benchmarking states is accurate. However, the student offers insufficient information on this front. A key example is the case of Canada, whose healthcare policy is broad and working adequately subject to the decentralized system. It is a case that would resonate well with the U.S given the many states in the country which mirrors the healthcare system of Canada that transcends to provincial deployment. God indeed has a plan for all of us to transform the operations in the globe, which may capture legislation or other available platforms for change. Learning from mistakes and changing how things are put to motion is a biblical concept with the scriptures stating, “As a dog returns to its vomit, so fools repeat their folly. Do you see a person wise in their own eyes? There is more hope for a fool than for them.”