Water Treatment Process: Removal of Iron and Manganese
As a basic and necessary method for treating water, absorption is the most important part of getting rid of iron and manganese, which are common contaminants that are very bad for water quality (Marcus et al., 2017). This complicated process works by moving metallic ions, mostly iron and manganese, from the liquid to the solid state. This is mostly made possible by special substances called absorbents or adsorbents. In general, the main goal of absorption in water treatment is to get rid of the bad effects that come with having high levels of iron and manganese in water sources, such as bad tastes and smells and even possible health risks (Abustan et al., 2017). By using carefully picked absorbents like activated carbon, zeolites, or modified clays, absorption provides an environment that makes it easy for these target ions to attract and stay in place, which removes them from the water matrix. By doing this, absorption not only makes water look better, but it also protects public health by lowering the risks of iron and manganese poisoning. This makes it an important part of all water treatment plans around the world.
One must have a deep understanding of all the different parts that make it work to properly understand how absorption works in order to remove iron and manganese (Bucs et al., 2022). An important part of this method is using special materials called absorbents. These are carefully chosen because they can only attract and hold on to the target metals ions, which are iron and manganese (Abustan et al., 2017). This selectivity is very important because it lets these contaminants be removed efficiently while causing the least amount of damage to other important parts of the water. This adds to the accuracy and effectiveness of the treatment process.
There is a wide range of materials that make up these absorbents. Each has its own unique qualities that make it good at getting rid of iron and manganese (Pakharuddin et al., 2021). As an absorber that is widely used in water treatment, activated carbon stands out because of its large surface area and porous structure. The ability to absorb metal ions comes from having many micro- and mesopores, which make it possible for metal ions to stick to it. Zeolites are crystalline aluminosilicate minerals that are also important in absorption processes because they can swap ions and have clear pore structures. Besides this, different kinds of modified clays that have been designed to improve their ability to absorb water are also used in water treatment.
When choosing these absorbents, many things must be carefully thought through including how well they stick to the target ions, how much they cost, and how easily they can be replaced. When these materials are added to a water treatment system, they make an area that is good for ion absorption. They do this by acting as a moving link between the liquid and solid phases. The absorbents work like sorbent matrices, attracting and holding on to the iron and manganese ions through chemical and physical interactions. This makes it easier for these toxins to move from the water phase to the solid phase. This well-planned process shows how complicated absorption can be in water treatment and how important it is to choose the right materials to get rid of iron and manganese from water sources in the best way possible and for a long time.
Numerous absorption models have been meticulously crafted to unravel the intricacies of the removal process, providing insights into both kinetic and equilibrium aspects (Piazza et al., 2019). These models offer a profound exploration of the kinetics and thermodynamics that govern the absorption process, serving as a foundational resource for the rational design and enhancement of water treatment systems, ensuring their efficacy in eliminating contaminants. The intricate principles of absorption kinetics elucidate the rate at which contaminants adhere to the selected absorbent material, providing a comprehensive understanding of the temporal dynamics of the process. This temporal insight is vital for determining the duration of contact required between water and absorbent to achieve optimal removal efficiency (Marsidi et al., 2018). Simultaneously, incorporating thermodynamics into absorption models enables a holistic examination of the energy changes and forces involved in the adsorption process, contributing to a more nuanced comprehension of the underlying mechanisms. Kinetic models shed light on the temporal evolution of the process, delineating the speed at which contaminants interact with the absorbent material.
Equilibrium models, such as Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms, elucidate the relationship between the concentration of contaminants in the water and their eventual adsorption onto the chosen absorbent. Langmuir and Freundlich adsorption isotherms, two of the most famous absorption models, have become very useful for figuring out how the concentration of contaminants in water affects how they stick to the chosen absorbing material. The Langmuir isotherm assumes that there is a single layer of adsorption and that the absorbent surface has a fixed number of similar adsorption sites (Kwakye-Awuah et al., 2019). It figures out that there is a mathematical link between the equilibrium adsorption capacity and the contaminants’ concentration. The Freundlich isotherm, on the other hand, can be used in more situations because it takes into account different types of adsorption sites and layered adsorption (Joshi et al., 2017). This model includes an empirical constant that shows how strong the adsorption is. It works especially well when the absorbent’s surface features are different. When used in absorption modelling, these isotherms are a powerful way to predict and improve the absorption process’s efficiency under different situations. They give people who work in water treatment a way to make their systems work as well as possible.
These absorption models are also very important for improving the accuracy of water treatment systems because they show how different factors, like pH, temperature, and the presence of competing ions, affect how well iron and manganese are removed (Joshi et al., 2017). For example, the pH of the water can have a big effect on the surface charge of both the contaminants and the absorbent material. This can change how the two interact electrically, which in turn changes how the contaminants and absorbent material adsorb. Changes in temperature can affect how quickly the process happens, and competing ions can make it harder for the absorber to pick out the contaminants that it needs to remove (Kalvani et al., 2021). Absorption models are a great way to study how these factors change over time and interact with each other. They give great advice for improving systems and making sure that water treatment plans work in all kinds of weather conditions.
There are many good reasons why absorption is used so often in water treatment methods to get rid of iron and manganese (Kwakye-Awuah et al., 2019). Firstly, absorption stands out as an option that is both cheap and good for the environment. This is especially true when compared to chemical treatment methods that are usually used to get rid of contaminants. Chemical treatments often need expensive reagents and can make harmful by-products, which adds to the cost of doing business and raises environmental issues. Absorption, on the other hand, uses absorbent materials that are naturally occurring or easy to get, like activated carbon or zeolites. This means that water treatment methods have less of an effect on the environment and on the economy (Faye et al., 2021). This fits with environmentally friendly methods and makes absorption even more appealing as a way to get rid of iron and manganese that is also good for business.
Second, one of the best things about absorption is that it is very selective. This means that it can remove only certain contaminants without hurting other important parts of water. This selection is very important for keeping water quality high because it makes sure that important minerals and nutrients are not lost during the removal process (El-Sheikh et al., 2016). Being able to tell the difference between contaminants lets water treatment systems focus on getting rid of iron and manganese. This lowers the risk of side effects and keeps the treated water’s general quality (Joshi et al., 2017). Also, the selectivity of absorption fits with the growing focus on accuracy and efficiency in water treatment, making it even more of a smart and careful way to improve water quality while having the least amount of side effects on the composition of treated water.
Another important benefit is that the absorbents used in the soaking process can be used again and again. Some treatment methods need to keep replacing their products, but many absorbent materials can be made again and again. This makes them last longer and makes the treatment process more environmentally friendly (Ibrahim et al., 2015). Regeneration is the process of making the absorbent able to absorb again, which is usually done by discharge or washing. This not only cuts down on how often the absorbent needs to be replaced, but it also helps save resources and cut down on waste (Kwakye-Awuah et al., 2019). So, the fact that absorbents can be used again and again makes absorption a better way to remove iron and manganese from water treatment systems, both from an economic and an environmental point of view. Properly treated water ensures not only the elimination of metallic taste and discoloration but also safeguards against health risks posed by excessive iron and manganese intake, underscoring the importance of efficient absorption processes in promoting human health through access to clean and safe drinking water (Dvorak & Schuerman, 2021).
Studies in the field of absorption modelling often look at how pH, temperature, and the presence of competing ions affect how well iron and manganese are removed. It is important to understand these details when building water treatment systems that can always provide high-quality treated water (Kwakye-Awuah et al., 2019). Nanotechnology progress has also led to study into new absorbent materials with better properties. This has opened up even more ways to make absorption-based water treatment processes more effective.
In conclusion, absorption stands out as a flexible and useful way to get rid of iron and manganese in water treatment. When you carefully choose your absorbents and know a lot about absorption models, you can make water treatment systems that work well and last a long time (Mojiri & Bashir, 2022). Utilizing the benefits of absorption, including its low cost, selectivity, and ability to grow back, makes sure that water treatment methods not only meet legal requirements but also help to make water resource management more sustainable as a whole. The ideas in review papers about absorption modelling are very important for helping us learn more about this important way to treat water and making it work better in real life.
References
Abustan, I., Harmuni, H., & Mohd, R. R. M. A. Z. (2017). Removal of iron and manganese using granular activated carbon and zeolite in artificial barrier of riverbank filtration. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1835(1), 020056. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983796
Bucs, S. S., Farhat, N., & Fortunato, L. (2022). Water Treatment Process. Membranes, 12(5), 543. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes12050543
Dvorak, B., & Schuerman, B. (2021, May). Drinking Water: Iron and Manganese. Extension Publications – University of Nebraska-Lincoln. Retrieved from https://extensionpublications.unl.edu/publication/g1714/html/view
El-Sheikh, M. A., Guirguis, H. S., & Amer, A. (2016). A comparative study of methods used for Fe and Mn oxidation and removal from groundwater. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 63(4), 277-292. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/326990940_A_comparative_study_of_methods_used_for_fe_and_mn_oxidation_and_removal_from_groundwater
Faye, M., Sambe, F. M., Diop, E. H. M., Toure, A. O., Mbaye, F. A., & Diop, M. C. G. (2021). Iron in Water: Study of Iron Removal Kinetics in Chemically Reconstituted Waters: Application to Groundwater of South Pout (PS2 Site). Open Journal of Metal, 11(1), March, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojmetal.2021.111001
Ibrahim, N., Aziz, H. A., & Yusoff, M. S. (2015). Heavy metals concentration in river and pumping well water for river bank filtration (RBF) system: A case study in Sungai Kerian. Jurnal Teknologi, 74(11). https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v74.4861
Salema, M. G., El-Awady, M. H., & Amin, E. (2012). Enhanced Removal of Dissolved Iron and Manganese from Nonconventional Water Resources in Delta District, Egypt. Energy Procedia, 18, 983–993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2012.05.113
Kalvani, N., Mesdaghinia, A., Yaghmaeian, K., Abolli, S., Saadi, S., Rashidi Mehrabadi, A., & Alimohammadi, M. (2021). Evaluation of iron and manganese removal effectiveness by treatment plant modules based on water pollution index; a comprehensive approach. Journal of environmental health science & engineering, 19(1), 1005–1013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-021-00665-2
Krishnakumari, B., Abhishek, V. Mohit, Puneeth, T. E., Vignesh, S., & Mohamed Irfan, M. K. (2018). Removal of Iron and Manganese From Ground Water. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology (IJERT), PECTEAM – 2018, 6(02). DOI: 10.17577/IJERTCON008. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.17577/IJERTCON008
Kwakye-Awuah, B., Sefa-Ntiri, B., Von-Kiti, E., Nkrumah, I., & Williams, C. (2019). Adsorptive Removal of Iron and Manganese from Groundwater Samples in Ghana by Zeolite Y Synthesized from Bauxite and Kaolin. Water, 11(9), 1912. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11091912
Joshi, T. P., Zhang, G., Cheng, H., Liu, R., Liu, H., & Qu, J. (2017). Transformation of para arsanilic acid by manganese oxide: Adsorption, oxidation, and influencing factors. Water Research, 116, 126-134. [DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.03.028] [PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28329708]
Marcus, D. N., Pinto, A., Anantharaman, K., Ruberg, S. A., Kramer, E. L., Raskin, L., et al. (2017). Diverse manganese(II)-oxidizing bacteria are prevalent in drinking water systems. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 9, 120–128. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12508
Marsidi, N., Hasan, H. A., & Abdullah, S. R. S. (2018). A review of biological aerated filters for iron and manganese ions removal in water treatment. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 23, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2018.01.010
Mojiri, A., & Bashir, M. J. K. (2022). Wastewater Treatment: Current and Future Techniques. Water, 14(3), 448. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14030448
Pakharuddin, N. H., Fazly, M. N., Ahmad Sukari, S. H., Tho, K., & Zamri, W. F. H. (2021). Water treatment process using conventional and advanced methods: A comparative study of Malaysia and selected countries. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 880, 012017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/880/1/012017
Piazza, A., Ciancio Casalini, L., Pacini, V. A., Sanguinetti, G., Ottado, J., & Gottig, N. (2019). Environmental Bacteria Involved in Manganese(II) Oxidation and Removal From Groundwater. Frontiers in Microbiology, 10, Article 119. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00119